Issue · Environment

Environment

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Nicole Uhre-Balk
100% support rate
Top opponent
Tina Mulally
12% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving environment in South Dakota

Legislators moving environment in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Nicole Uhre-Balk
Nicole Uhre-Balk House · District 32
D
Strong +
100% 10
Erik Muckey
Erik Muckey House · District 15
D
Strong +
100% 8
Mary Fitzgerald
Mary Fitzgerald House · District 31
R
Strong +
100% 7
Scott Odenbach
Scott Odenbach House · District 31
R
Strong +
100% 7
Kadyn Wittman
Kadyn Wittman House · District 15
D
Strong +
92% 13
Tina Mulally
Tina Mulally House · District 35
R
Strong −
12% 8
Aaron Aylward
Aaron Aylward House · District 6
R
Oppose
25% 8
Dylan Jordan
Dylan Jordan House · District 4
R
Oppose
29% 7
Phil Jensen
Phil Jensen House · District 33
R
Oppose
29% 7
Logan Manhart
Logan Manhart House · District 1
R
Mixed −
43% 7
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All environment bills

passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 25, 2026

SCR 605: recognizing the significance of the monarch butterfly and encouraging cooperative, voluntary conservation efforts in South Dakota.

Senate Concurrent Resolution 605 is a non-binding resolution recognizing the monarch butterfly's ecological importance and encouraging voluntary conservation efforts in South Dakota. It urges state agencies, local governments, and land managers to preserve existing milkweed habitats where practical and prioritize pollinator-friendly native seed mixes - including milkweed - in plantings that align with land management goals. The resolution specifically emphasizes voluntary cooperation with landowners and agricultural operations, avoiding regulatory impacts, while urging federal agencies to support these efforts through technical assistance. It does not create new legal requirements but formally supports existing conservation practices.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 10, 2026

HB 1271: prohibit weather and climate modification activities and provide a penalty therefor.

HB 1271 prohibits the intentional release of specific chemicals (like aluminum barium, sulfur dioxide, or PFAS-containing chaff) into the atmosphere for weather modification, directly affecting operators of equipment used for such activities. It establishes a $100,000 minimum civil penalty per violation (plus $10,000 daily for ongoing violations) and creates a dedicated monitoring fund to cover enforcement costs. The bill requires airports to report aircraft equipped with weather-modification devices (excluding standard agricultural sprayers) to the Department of Transportation, which forwards reports to the Agriculture Department for investigation. Key mechanisms include online violation reporting, departmental investigation rules, and airport compliance reporting starting July 2026.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 3, 2026

HB 1157: establish a task force for the purpose of studying aquatic invasive species infestations, to make an appropriation therefor, and to declare an emergency.

HB 1157 creates a 12-member task force to study ecological damage and costs from aquatic invasive species in South Dakota. The task force includes representatives from state agencies (Game, Fish and Parks; Agriculture; Tourism), tribal organizations, water development districts, recreation industries, and environmental groups. It must submit a report by November 2026 detailing prevention strategies, cost estimates, and funding recommendations for addressing invasive species. The bill appropriates $50,000 from the general fund for task force expenses and declares an emergency to expedite implementation.
in committee · South Dakota · House Feb 2, 2026

HB 1103: require that annual withdrawal of groundwater from any groundwater source may not exceed the annual recharge of water to the groundwater source.

HB 1103 requires that any annual withdrawal of groundwater from a source cannot exceed the natural annual recharge rate of that source. The bill amends groundwater appropriation rules to prohibit approving new water rights if withdrawal would exceed recharge, based on available data. It directly affects applicants seeking groundwater rights, including agricultural users, municipalities, and industries. An exception allows withdrawals exceeding recharge for older groundwater formations used by public water systems.