This bill exempts victims of human trafficking or domestic abuse from specific clemency notice requirements when applying for clemency. It directly affects individuals in these victim categories who are seeking clemency by removing a requirement to receive certain notices. To qualify, applicants must submit their own affidavit confirming victim status (citing specific statutes) plus affidavits from two professionals (e.g., law enforcement, mental health providers, or victim advocates) who verify the claim. The professionals must represent different agencies to ensure independent verification.
SB 41 revises South Dakota's criminal invasion of privacy law to prohibit creating, distributing, or selling digitally manipulated images or videos that falsely depict an identifiable person as nude or engaged in sexual acts. It specifically targets content that appears authentic to an ordinary person but was altered to misrepresent the individual. The law defines "digitally fabricated material" as manipulated images, videos, or depictions that falsely show an identifiable person in states of nudity or sexual activity. Violating this provision is a Class 5 felony, with penalties applying when the manipulated content is shared to harass or embarrass the person depicted.
SB 107 amends South Dakota law to explicitly include licensed and registered child care programs within the definition of "community safety zone." This means the 500-foot buffer zone around such facilities - including day care centers, group family day care homes, and registered family day care - will now be covered by the same restrictions on sex offender residence as schools, shelters, and public parks. The bill clarifies that all licensed and registered child care programs are explicitly included under existing definitions without adding new facilities to the list. This change directly affects sex offenders required to register under South Dakota law, as they are barred from residing within these zones without specific exemptions.
SB 42 increases penalties for possessing, delivering, or ingesting controlled substances within South Dakota state correctional facilities. It changes inmate possession of controlled substances from a Class 3 to a Class 4 felony, delivery to inmates from a Class 4 to a Class 3 felony, and ingestion by inmates from a Class 6 to a Class 5 felony. These changes directly affect inmates, staff, and visitors who bring or use controlled substances in prisons. The bill strengthens criminal penalties for drug-related activities in correctional settings without altering treatment programs.
HB 1108 allows courts to immediately seal court files when protection order petitions are dismissed, either initially or after a hearing. This applies directly to individuals whose protection order cases (covered under South Dakota statutes §22-19A-8 and §25-10-3) are dismissed by a judge. The key provision requires courts to grant sealing of the entire court file upon dismissal, rather than requiring additional steps or waiting periods. This change provides a streamlined process for removing sensitive court records from public view in dismissed cases. The bill affects anyone involved in a dismissed protection order case, focusing on expediting privacy protections.
HB 1183 revises South Dakota's law granting immunity from prosecution for drug possession charges after an overdose. It directly affects individuals experiencing a drug-related overdose who contact emergency services for medical help. The key change specifies that immunity only applies if the evidence used for any charges stems from the overdose event itself and the need for medical assistance. This clarifies eligibility for the existing immunity provision, requiring that the evidence leading to prosecution originated during the overdose situation. The bill does not expand immunity but refines the conditions under which it applies.
HB 1175 revises South Dakota law to clarify that the Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe (and other Indian tribes) can request background checks through the Division of Criminal Investigation for specific tribal positions. It directly affects tribal members seeking roles as tribal council members, judges, conservation officers, educators, child protection workers, and others listed in the bill. The key mechanism requires tribes to submit applicants' fingerprints to the state division, which then forwards them to the FBI for a national check if no state-level disqualifications exist, with tribes or applicants covering processing fees.
This bill updates South Dakota's search and seizure laws to explicitly include digital currency as "property" covered by existing warrant procedures. It defines digital currency as value recorded on blockchain or similar distributed ledger technology (e.g., Bitcoin). The change ensures law enforcement must follow standard warrant processes when seeking digital currency, aligning it with how physical property is treated under current law. This directly affects law enforcement investigations involving digital assets and individuals holding such currency.
HB 1238 allows South Dakota financial institutions to delay or block specific transactions when they reasonably suspect financial exploitation of consenting adults aged 65+ (seniors) or adults aged 18+ with mental impairments or court-appointed guardians (vulnerable adults). The law permits banks to refuse transfers, withdrawals, ownership changes, beneficiary updates, or power-of-attorney instructions if exploitation is suspected. Financial institutions are protected from liability for acting under this law, though they are not required to intervene - decisions are based on available information. This directly affects banks and the vulnerable adults they serve by providing a legal framework to prevent financial abuse.
This bill amends South Dakota law (§ 22-19B-4) to upgrade penalties for preventing someone from practicing their religion through threats or violence. Currently a Class 1 misdemeanor, the offense would become a Class 6 felony under this bill. It directly affects individuals who use intimidation or force to stop others from engaging in legally protected religious activities. The key change is reclassifying the penalty level in the statute, increasing the legal consequences for such conduct.
