Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
12
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Erik Muckey
95% support rate
Top opponent
John Carley
21% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving criminal justice in South Dakota

Legislators moving criminal justice in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Erik Muckey
Erik Muckey House · District 15
D
Strong +
95% 19
Nicole Uhre-Balk
Nicole Uhre-Balk House · District 32
D
Strong +
88% 17
Ernie Otten
Ernie Otten Senate · District 6
R
Strong +
86% 14
Jack Kolbeck
Jack Kolbeck House · District 13
R
Strong +
85% 20
Erin Healy
Erin Healy House · District 10
D
Strong +
82% 17
John Carley
John Carley Senate · District 29
R
Oppose
21% 14
Taffy Howard
Taffy Howard Senate · District 34
R
Oppose
23% 13
Phil Jensen
Phil Jensen House · District 33
R
Oppose
24% 17
Dylan Jordan
Dylan Jordan House · District 4
R
Oppose
24% 21
Heather Baxter
Heather Baxter House · District 34
R
Oppose
24% 21
Showing 1–10 of 12 bills

All criminal justice bills

signed · South Dakota · House Mar 30, 2026

HB 1300: except victims of human trafficking or domestic abuse from certain clemency notice requirements.

This bill exempts victims of human trafficking or domestic abuse from specific clemency notice requirements when applying for clemency. It directly affects individuals in these victim categories who are seeking clemency by removing a requirement to receive certain notices. To qualify, applicants must submit their own affidavit confirming victim status (citing specific statutes) plus affidavits from two professionals (e.g., law enforcement, mental health providers, or victim advocates) who verify the claim. The professionals must represent different agencies to ensure independent verification.
signed · South Dakota · House Mar 30, 2026

HB 1298: prohibit the electronic publication of certain information about a judicial officer or law enforcement officer and provide a penalty therefor.

HB 1298 prohibits publishing a judicial or law enforcement officer's home address, date of birth, or social security number online without their consent if done with the intent to cause fear for the officer's safety or their immediate family's safety. The law applies only to electronic publications and targets individuals who share such sensitive personal information under these specific conditions. Violating this prohibition is classified as a Class 6 felony. The bill directly protects officers by restricting the online dissemination of their personal details that could enable threats or harassment.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 41: revise a provision related to criminal invasions of privacy, prohibit the creation and distribution of digitally fabricated material of an identifiable individual, and provide penalties therefor.

SB 41 revises South Dakota's criminal invasion of privacy law to prohibit creating, distributing, or selling digitally manipulated images or videos that falsely depict an identifiable person as nude or engaged in sexual acts. It specifically targets content that appears authentic to an ordinary person but was altered to misrepresent the individual. The law defines "digitally fabricated material" as manipulated images, videos, or depictions that falsely show an identifiable person in states of nudity or sexual activity. Violating this provision is a Class 5 felony, with penalties applying when the manipulated content is shared to harass or embarrass the person depicted.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 44: establish investigative subpoena authority to gather business records in certain investigations.

SB 44 allows South Dakota's Attorney General to obtain business records from internet and telecom providers during criminal investigations of internet crimes against children or human trafficking. It requires judicial approval based on "reasonable cause" before issuing subpoenas for specific records like IP addresses, account details, and device information. Hughes County judges have statewide authority to approve these subpoenas, which cannot notify account holders, and obtained records must be used solely for law enforcement with privacy safeguards. The bill directly affects providers (including internet and telecom companies) by mandating compliance with court-ordered requests for targeted data.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 42: enhance the penalties for ingestion, possession with intent to deliver, and delivery of a controlled substance in a state correctional facility.

SB 42 increases penalties for possessing, delivering, or ingesting controlled substances within South Dakota state correctional facilities. It changes inmate possession of controlled substances from a Class 3 to a Class 4 felony, delivery to inmates from a Class 4 to a Class 3 felony, and ingestion by inmates from a Class 6 to a Class 5 felony. These changes directly affect inmates, staff, and visitors who bring or use controlled substances in prisons. The bill strengthens criminal penalties for drug-related activities in correctional settings without altering treatment programs.
signed · South Dakota · House Mar 30, 2026

HB 1108: require the sealing of court files upon dismissal or denial of a petition for a protection order.

HB 1108 allows courts to immediately seal court files when protection order petitions are dismissed, either initially or after a hearing. This applies directly to individuals whose protection order cases (covered under South Dakota statutes §22-19A-8 and §25-10-3) are dismissed by a judge. The key provision requires courts to grant sealing of the entire court file upon dismissal, rather than requiring additional steps or waiting periods. This change provides a streamlined process for removing sensitive court records from public view in dismissed cases. The bill affects anyone involved in a dismissed protection order case, focusing on expediting privacy protections.
signed · South Dakota · House Mar 30, 2026

HB 1175: revise provisions related to Division of Criminal Investigation cooperation with Indian tribes.

HB 1175 revises South Dakota law to clarify that the Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe (and other Indian tribes) can request background checks through the Division of Criminal Investigation for specific tribal positions. It directly affects tribal members seeking roles as tribal council members, judges, conservation officers, educators, child protection workers, and others listed in the bill. The key mechanism requires tribes to submit applicants' fingerprints to the state division, which then forwards them to the FBI for a national check if no state-level disqualifications exist, with tribes or applicants covering processing fees.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 10, 2026

SB 113: increase the penalty for preventing practice of religion.

This bill amends South Dakota law (§ 22-19B-4) to upgrade penalties for preventing someone from practicing their religion through threats or violence. Currently a Class 1 misdemeanor, the offense would become a Class 6 felony under this bill. It directly affects individuals who use intimidation or force to stop others from engaging in legally protected religious activities. The key change is reclassifying the penalty level in the statute, increasing the legal consequences for such conduct.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 9, 2026

SB 81: clarify the prohibition on injuring or harassing a service animal.

SB 81 clarifies South Dakota's law against harming service animals by specifying that it is illegal to maliciously beat, injure, harass, or interfere with a service animal that is controlled by a person with a disability and wearing a harness or control device. The bill directly affects individuals with disabilities who rely on service animals and anyone who might harass or harm such animals. It explicitly defines "service animal" as a dog trained to perform tasks directly related to a person's disability (per federal guidelines), excluding emotional support, comfort, or crime deterrent effects. The law makes it a Class 2 misdemeanor to violate these provisions.
signed · South Dakota · House Feb 17, 2026

HB 1076: revise restrictions on residence within a community safety zone and to declare an emergency.

HB 1076 revises restrictions on where sex offenders can live near community safety zones (areas near schools, parks, or shelters). It adds two new exceptions allowing offenders to reside there: if they established their home before July 1, 2024, or if the school/park was built after they moved in. The bill expands existing exceptions for offenders in prison, halfway houses, homeless shelters, or healthcare facilities. Violations remain felonies, with repeat offenses carrying harsher penalties. The bill also declares an emergency to take immediate effect.
Showing 1 to 10 of 12 bills
1 2 Next