Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
7
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Erik Muckey
95% support rate
Top opponent
John Carley
21% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving criminal justice in South Dakota

Legislators moving criminal justice in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Erik Muckey
Erik Muckey House · District 15
D
Strong +
95% 19
Nicole Uhre-Balk
Nicole Uhre-Balk House · District 32
D
Strong +
88% 17
Ernie Otten
Ernie Otten Senate · District 6
R
Strong +
86% 14
Jack Kolbeck
Jack Kolbeck House · District 13
R
Strong +
85% 20
Erin Healy
Erin Healy House · District 10
D
Strong +
82% 17
John Carley
John Carley Senate · District 29
R
Oppose
21% 14
Taffy Howard
Taffy Howard Senate · District 34
R
Oppose
23% 13
Phil Jensen
Phil Jensen House · District 33
R
Oppose
24% 17
Dylan Jordan
Dylan Jordan House · District 4
R
Oppose
24% 21
Heather Baxter
Heather Baxter House · District 34
R
Oppose
24% 21
Showing 7 of 7 bills

All criminal justice bills

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 45: revise a provision regulating delta-8 tetrahydrocannabinol, THC-O acetate, and hexahydrocannabinol for persons under the age of twenty-one and to provide a penalty therefor.

SB 45 prohibits the sale, distribution, or possession of specific cannabis products (including delta-8 THC, THC-O acetate, and hexahydrocannabinol) to individuals under 21 years old. It makes it a Class 6 felony to sell or distribute these products to minors, and a Class 2 misdemeanor for minors to possess or consume them, or for adults (other than parents/guardians) to provide them to minors. The law directly affects retailers, minors under 21, and adults who might supply these products to underage individuals. Penalties are clearly defined based on the specific violation.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 10, 2026

SB 113: increase the penalty for preventing practice of religion.

This bill amends South Dakota law (§ 22-19B-4) to upgrade penalties for preventing someone from practicing their religion through threats or violence. Currently a Class 1 misdemeanor, the offense would become a Class 6 felony under this bill. It directly affects individuals who use intimidation or force to stop others from engaging in legally protected religious activities. The key change is reclassifying the penalty level in the statute, increasing the legal consequences for such conduct.
signed · South Dakota · House Mar 9, 2026

HB 1162: add certain substances to Schedule I of the controlled substances schedule.

HB 1162 adds 59 specific substances - including synthetic opioids like "W-18" and "butonitazene," as well as compounds such as "methiopropamine" - to South Dakota's Schedule I controlled substances list. This means these substances are now classified as having no medical use and a high potential for abuse under state law. The bill directly affects anyone in South Dakota who possesses, distributes, or uses these listed substances, making such actions illegal without specific exemptions. The key mechanism is the explicit inclusion of these chemical compounds (including isomers and salts) into Schedule I, closing potential legal gaps for enforcement.
signed · South Dakota · House Mar 9, 2026

HB 1126: revise a provision related to driving under the influence.

HB 1126 revises South Dakota's penalties for repeat driving under the influence (DUI) offenses. It targets individuals with five or more prior DUI convictions within 15 years (down from 25 years), requiring a mandatory minimum six-year prison sentence for a sixth or subsequent offense, with at least one year on parole. The bill mandates specific monitoring tools like ignition interlocks or alcohol bracelets during supervision and extends driver's license revocation periods, with limited exceptions for employment or medical needs after completing treatment. These changes apply directly to repeat DUI offenders meeting the revised conviction thresholds.
passed · South Dakota · House Mar 2, 2026

HB 1065: revise the medical purpose affirmative defense in cannabis prosecution.

HB 1065 would require individuals facing cannabis-related charges to possess a registry identification card to use a legal defense claiming they are permitted to possess cannabis. Currently, South Dakota law does not mandate this card for such defenses, but the bill would amend § 34-20G-53 to make it a requirement. This change would directly affect people charged with cannabis offenses who attempt to rely on this specific defense in court. The bill creates a new condition for accessing this defense, requiring the card as a prerequisite for its use.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 11, 2026

HB 1031: revise and repeal provisions related to rape offenses and to increase the penalty therefor.

HB 1031 revises South Dakota's rape offense definitions and increases penalties, primarily affecting victims under 13 and perpetrators convicted of sexual crimes against minors. It adds new circumstances to rape definitions (e.g., victim incapacity due to intoxication) and establishes a 15-year minimum sentence for first offenses involving victims under 13. The bill also removes the statute of limitations for rape cases involving victims under 13 or using force/coercion, allowing charges to be filed until the victim turns 25. These changes directly impact criminal sentencing for sexual offenses and extend legal accountability for certain victims.
passed · South Dakota · House Jan 26, 2026

HB 1083: revise certain provisions related to stalking, establish the crime of felony stalking of a public official, and provide a penalty therefor.

South Dakota's HB 1083 creates a new felony charge for stalking public officials, separate from general stalking offenses. It defines "public official" to include elected state/federal leaders, legislators, judges, and law enforcement officers. The bill specifies that intentionally stalking these officials with the intent to cause fear of death or serious harm constitutes a Class 6 felony, carrying the same penalty as existing felony stalking of children. This amendment modifies existing stalking laws (§ 22-19A-1) by adding a specific provision for public officials, without changing penalties for general stalking or stalking children. The law directly affects public officials and those who target them through repeated following, threats, or harassment.