Issue · Budget & Taxes

Budget & Taxes

Every budget & taxes bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
16
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Peri Pourier
91% support rate
Top opponent
Tina Mulally
19% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving budget & taxes in South Dakota

Legislators moving budget & taxes in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Peri Pourier
Peri Pourier House · District 27
R
Strong +
91% 44
Trish Ladner
Trish Ladner House · District 30
R
Strong +
90% 39
Chris Kassin
Chris Kassin House · District 17
R
Strong +
88% 67
Mike Derby
Mike Derby House · District 34
R
Strong +
88% 67
Greg Jamison
Greg Jamison House · District 12
R
Strong +
87% 47
Tina Mulally
Tina Mulally House · District 35
R
Strong −
19% 42
Phil Jensen
Phil Jensen House · District 33
R
Strong −
20% 55
Tony Randolph
Tony Randolph House · District 35
R
Oppose
27% 56
Dylan Jordan
Dylan Jordan House · District 4
R
Oppose
30% 50
Logan Manhart
Logan Manhart House · District 1
R
Oppose
35% 51
Showing 11–16 of 16 bills

All budget & taxes bills

passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 20, 2026

SJR 506: proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, resetting, then limiting property taxes to a flat rate, until adjusted when sold.

SJR 506 proposes a constitutional amendment to limit South Dakota property taxes to a flat rate based on a property's most recent sale price. For 2028 taxes, the maximum cannot exceed the lower of the 2027 tax amount or the higher of the 2020 tax amount or 1% (for year-round residents) or 2% (for non-residents) of the most recent sale price. For subsequent years, the tax cap resets annually to the higher of the previous year's tax or the applicable percentage of the most recent sale price if ownership changed. This amendment would directly affect all South Dakota property owners, with non-resident owners facing a higher 2% rate versus 1% for residents. If approved by voters, it would replace current property tax calculation methods.
passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 18, 2026

SJR 503: applying to the United States Congress for a convention of the states to propose amendments to the United States Constitution regarding the imposition of fiscal restraints on the federal government, further limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office for members of Congress and other federal officials.

South Dakota's Senate Joint Resolution 503 applies to the U.S. Congress to call a convention of states for proposing constitutional amendments. The resolution specifically requests amendments to impose fiscal restraints on federal spending, further limit federal power and jurisdiction, and establish term limits for members of Congress and other federal officials. It includes conditions requiring the convention to be limited to these topics only and ensuring Congress performs only a ministerial role in convening it. This procedural resolution does not create new law but initiates a state-level step toward potential constitutional change under Article V of the U.S. Constitution.
signed · South Dakota · House Feb 17, 2026

HB 1058: require licensure for online pari-mutuel wagering pools for horse and dog races, and clarify the application of tax therefor.

HB 1058 requires online betting platforms offering pari-mutuel wagering on horse or dog races to obtain a specific license from South Dakota. It clarifies that both in-state operators (with a physical presence) and out-of-state operators must pay a tax of 1.5% on South Dakota contributions, while multi-jurisdictional hubs pay 0.25% (with portions going to racing and breeding funds). The bill specifies that tax revenue will fund the state, a special racing revolving fund, and a South Dakota-bred racing fund. This applies only to online wagering for authorized horse and dog races, updating existing tax and licensing rules.
failed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 17, 2026

SB 187: define nonpublic school.

SB 187 defines "nonpublic school" in South Dakota law as an institution operated by individuals or groups (not publicly elected boards) that teaches math and English fundamentals to children of compulsory school age, with English instruction focused on mastery. The bill specifies that such schools may limit enrollment, charge tuition, receive grants or services from school districts, but cannot claim geographic territory for tax revenue or receive state education aid under Chapter 13-13. It also clarifies that nonpublic schools are not required to be accredited or have certified teachers. This definition applies to all nonpublic schools in South Dakota, establishing their legal boundaries for funding and operations.
passed · South Dakota · Senate Jan 21, 2026

SB 58: reduce to zero mill levies for property taxation.

This bill (SB 58) modifies South Dakota's property tax code to eliminate a specific county road maintenance levy. It amends Section 10-12-13 to reduce the maximum annual tax levy for county highway and bridge reserve funds from $0.90-$1.20 per $1,000 of taxable value to $0.00 per $1,000. This change directly affects counties that previously used this levy to fund road maintenance, requiring them to find alternative funding sources for highway and bridge projects. The bill does not alter general property tax rates or other levy types; it specifically targets the road maintenance tax provision.
passed · South Dakota · Senate Jan 15, 2026

SCR 601: encouraging honest economic development rooted in the republican principles of limited government, deregulation, and organic entrepreneurial growth.

SCR 601 is a symbolic Senate Concurrent Resolution (not a binding law) introduced by Senator Carley. It urges South Dakota to pursue economic policies aligned with "free market principles," emphasizing limited government, deregulation, and low taxes over tax incentives or subsidies for businesses. The resolution argues that government should only protect rights and avoid competing with private enterprise, instead focusing on "organic entrepreneurial growth." It directly affects state legislative and executive policy development by advocating for a specific philosophical approach to economic growth.
Showing 11 to 16 of 16 bills