Sign Up
Home › South Carolina › Bills
Bills

South Carolina Congressional Bills

Browse federal bills sponsored by your state's delegation.

State Legislature US Congress
All 5,668 Active 20 In committee 5,011 Passed 626 Signed 104 Failed 10
Showing 1–10 of 10 bills
failed · South Carolina · House May 21, 2026

HR 1329: Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act

The Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act authorizes the creation of a new Smithsonian museum dedicated to women’s history, to be located within the National Mall Reserve in Washington, D.C. If the site is managed by another federal agency, the bill requires that agency to transfer the land after notifying Congress and relevant committees. The museum must ensure exhibits and programs accurately represent diverse women’s experiences by consulting a broad range of experts and community voices. The Smithsonian will submit biennial reports to Congress detailing how the museum meets these representation standards.
Nicole Malliotakis (R) · 231 co-sponsors
failed · South Carolina · House Nov 18, 2025

HRES 888: Censuring and condemning Delegate Stacey Plaskett and removing her from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence for conduct that reflects discreditably on the House of Representatives for colluding with convicted felony sex offender Jeffrey Epstein during a congressional hearing.

HRES 888 is a proposed resolution to formally censure and condemn Delegate Stacey Plaskett for coordinating with Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender, during a February 2019 congressional hearing. The resolution claims Plaskett received real-time text messages from Epstein with instructions on her questioning during the hearing. If passed, the resolution would remove Plaskett from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and direct the Committee on Ethics to investigate her ties to Epstein. This action directly affects Plaskett, the Delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands, and addresses alleged misconduct during official congressional proceedings.
Ralph Norman (R) · 21 co-sponsors
failed · South Carolina · House Jul 23, 2024

HR 7887: ACCESS Act

This bill requires federal contractors to justify any education or experience requirements for their staff before bidding on government contracts, instead of automatically mandating specific degrees or job years. Contracting officers must explain why such requirements are necessary to meet agency needs and how they ensure qualified personnel. Contractors must also consider alternatives like apprenticeships, industry certifications, or work-based learning programs as valid qualifications. The policy applies to contracts issued 180 days after enactment, with OMB guidance required within 60 days to implement these changes.
Topics ✓ Labor & EmploymentSupports Labor & EmploymentRequires justification for education/experience requirements, promotes alternatives like apprenticeships, advancing worker access to federal contracts.95% confidence
Nancy Mace (R) · 1 co-sponsor
failed · South Carolina · House Jul 11, 2024

HRES 1344: Finding that Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, is in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a certain subpoena.

This resolution (HRES 1344) formally declares Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of the House of Representatives for failing to produce subpoenaed materials related to the Special Counsel's investigation of President Biden's handling of classified documents. It specifically cites his refusal to turn over "audio tapes" requested by the House Judiciary and Oversight committees on February 27, 2024. The resolution mandates that the Speaker impose a daily $10,000 fine on Garland (payable from his personal funds, not taxpayer money) until he complies with the subpoena. As a procedural resolution - not a law - it addresses a specific dispute over congressional oversight authority, not policy changes.
Anna Paulina Luna (R) · 5 co-sponsors
failed · South Carolina · Senate Apr 18, 2024

S 4072: A bill to prohibit the use of funds to implement, administer, or enforce certain rules of the Environmental Protection Agency.

This bill prohibits federal funding for implementing, administering, or enforcing specific Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) vehicle emissions rules. It directly affects the EPA's ability to enforce the proposed and final "Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and Later Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles" rules. The key mechanism blocks all fiscal year 2024 funds from being used for these particular rules or any substantially similar future rules. The bill does not alter the rules themselves but prevents their enforcement through funding restrictions.
Topics ✗ Budget & TaxesOpposes Budget & TaxesBlocks federal funds for EPA emissions rule enforcement, defunding specific regulatory activities under fiscal management.95% confidence ✗ EnergyOpposes EnergyBlocks EPA vehicle emissions rules, weakening clean energy standards for transportation sector compliance.90% confidence ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBlocks EPA funding for vehicle emissions rules, weakening enforcement of pollution standards and deregulating environmental protections.95% confidence ✗ TransportationOpposes TransportationBlocks EPA funding for vehicle emissions rules, weakening transportation-related regulations under the EPA's vehicle standards.85% confidence
Mike Crapo (R) · 18 co-sponsors
failed · South Carolina · Senate Nov 15, 2023

SJRES 43: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to "Improving Income Driven Repayment for the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program and the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program".

This bill (SJRES 43) is a joint resolution seeking to block a Department of Education rule that would have improved income-driven repayment plans for federal student loans. It targets a specific rule (88 Fed. Reg. 43820, July 10, 2023) affecting borrowers in the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program and the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program. If passed, the resolution would make this rule void, preventing it from taking effect. The resolution uses a specific procedural mechanism under Title 5 of U.S. Code to achieve this disapproval. It directly impacts student loan borrowers who rely on income-driven repayment options.
Topics ✗ EducationOpposes EducationBlocks improved income-driven repayment rule for federal student loans, limiting financial access to higher education and undermining borrower support.95% confidence
Bill Cassidy (R) · 36 co-sponsors
failed · South Carolina · House Sep 21, 2023

HRES 684: Condemning the actions of Governor of New Mexico, Michelle Lujan Grisham, for subverting the Second Amendment to the Constitution and depriving the citizens of New Mexico of their right to bear arms.

HRES 684 is a symbolic congressional resolution passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on September 14, 2023, condemning New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham's emergency order that temporarily suspended open and concealed carry firearm rights for 30 days. The resolution asserts the order violated the Second Amendment, citing Supreme Court precedents (Heller, McDonald, Bruen) and noting a federal judge had already blocked the order's firearm restrictions. It does not change any laws or impose legal consequences - it is solely a formal expression of disapproval from Congress. The resolution directly addresses the Governor's actions but has no effect on New Mexico's laws or citizens' rights.
Dan Newhouse (R) · 91 co-sponsors
failed · South Carolina · House Jun 22, 2023

HJRES 44: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives relating to "Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached 'Stabilizing Braces'".

HJRES 44 is a congressional resolution seeking to block a 2021 rule by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). The rule classified firearms with stabilizing braces as "short-barreled rifles," which would have required additional licensing and regulation. This resolution uses a specific legal process (under Title 5, U.S. Code) to formally disapprove the ATF rule, meaning the rule would no longer be in effect. It directly affects firearm owners, manufacturers, and dealers who would have been subject to the rule’s requirements.
Andrew S. Clyde (R) · 188 co-sponsors
failed · South Carolina · Senate Dec 14, 2022

SJRES 60: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to "Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection Criteria-Expanding Opportunity Through Quality Charter Schools Program (CSP)-Grants to State Entities (State Entity Grants); Grants to Charter Management Organizations for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (CMO Grants); and Grants to Charter School Developers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (Developer Grants)".

This joint resolution nullifies a Department of Education rule published on July 6, 2022, concerning final priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria for the Charter Schools Program.
Topics ✗ EducationOpposes EducationBill disapproves a Department of Education rule establishing grant criteria for charter school programs, effectively blocking implementation of the funding mechanism.92% confidence
Tim Scott (R) · 24 co-sponsors
failed · South Carolina · Senate May 26, 2022

SJRES 46: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security relating to "Procedures for Credible Fear Screening and Consideration of Asylum, Withholding of Removal, and CAT Protection Claims by Asylum Officers".

This joint resolution nullifies the interim final rule submitted by the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security and published on March 29, 2022, concerning procedures for the consideration of asylum claims and other related issues. (Among other changes, the interim final rule requires an asylum seeker subject to expedited removal to be screened by an asylum officer for a credible fear of persecution or torture, rather than a credible fear of persecution, reasonable possibility of persecution, or reasonable possibility of torture.)
Topics ✓ ImmigrationSupports ImmigrationNullifies DHS/DOJ rule tightening asylum screening (requiring 'persecution or torture' screening), reverting to broader 'credible fear' standard, thus supporting asylum access.90% confidence
Ron Johnson (R) · 30 co-sponsors