Constitutional amendment; ad valorem; reducing limitation on growth of fair cash value; modifying limitation on growth of fair cash value for homesteads of persons over sixty-five years of age.
Oklahoma's SJR 39 proposes a constitutional amendment to reduce limits on annual increases in property tax assessments. It would lower the maximum annual growth rate for most real property from 5% to 3% (for tax years 2027 onward) and further reduce limits for homestead properties (primary residences) and agricultural land from 3% to 1%. The amendment applies to locally assessed real property, excluding personal property and properties with recent transfers or improvements. If approved by voters, these changes would take effect for tax years beginning in 2027.
Bill status
failed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
Apr 2026
House Passage
Apr 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 2, 2026
Last action Apr 28, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons
What changed between versions
Floor (House)
→
Floor (Senate)
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was updated from the House version to the Senate floor version, which includes substantive changes to the proposed constitutional amendment. The amendment now explicitly sets different growth limits for general real property versus agricultural or homestead property, clarifies when the cap resets due to property transfers or improvements, and adds a requirement for the legislature to pass implementing laws.
Scope change
The scope of the property tax cap was expanded to explicitly include agricultural land and homestead exemptions, creating a two-tier system with lower caps for these categories.
ELIGIBILITY
The amendment now distinguishes between general real property and property with homestead or agricultural classifications, applying stricter growth limits to the latter.
DEFINITION
Added specific rules stating that the cap resets to full fair cash value if property ownership changes or if significant improvements are made to the property.
REQUIREMENT
Added a new requirement for the Legislature to enact any necessary laws to implement the new constitutional provisions.
TECHNICAL
Updated document headers and committee report dates to reflect the Senate floor version and the specific date of March 4, 2026.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 26, 2026 · House Apr 15, 2026
How they voted
39–8
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 50
Mar 26, 2026
D
Democratic9
88% Nay
R
Republican41
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
10
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Apr 28, 2026
Introduced
Filed with Secretary of State
upper
Apr 27, 2026
Committee
Referred for enrollment
upper
Apr 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Measure passed: Ayes: 40 Nays: 8
upper
Apr 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
HAs adopted AYES: 27 NAYS: 19
upper
Apr 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
Engrossed, signed, to Senate
lower
Apr 15, 2026
Committee
Referred for engrossment
lower
Apr 15, 2026
Lower · Passed
Special election provision passed: Ayes: 80 Nays: 14
lower
Apr 15, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 85 Nays: 9
lower
Apr 15, 2026
Introduced
Amended by floor substitute
lower
Apr 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
CR; Do Pass Rules Committee
lower
Mar 30, 2026
Introduced
First Reading
lower
Mar 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
Engrossed to House
upper
Mar 26, 2026
Committee
Referred for engrossment
upper
Mar 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Special Election passed: Ayes: 38 Nays: 8
upper
Mar 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Measure passed: Ayes: 38 Nays: 8
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Rules committee; CR filed
upper
Feb 2, 2026
Introduced
First Reading
upper
2 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SJR 39
Scope: OK
Hi! I can help you understand SJR 39. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline