Civil remedies; creating the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act. Effective date.

The document header was updated to read 'HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - FLOOR VERSION' instead of 'COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE', and page footers were changed from 'Req. No. 17445' to 'SB2182 HFLR'.

Removed the 'Proposed Policy Committee Substitute' header and replaced it with 'Committee Substitute for Engrossed Senate Bill No. 2182' to indicate the bill has been amended by the House Committee.

Adjusted line numbers and page footers to reflect the new text structure, including updating the requirement number from 17253 to 17445.

Inserted a blank line after the bill title to improve formatting consistency.

The entire original bill text was removed.

A new version of the bill was added with identical legal language but different header formatting and page numbering.

The header text was updated from 'ENGROSSED SENATE' to 'ENROLLED SENATE' to reflect the bill's final status.

A 'SUBJECT: Civil remedies' line was added to the top of the bill for organizational clarity.

Minor punctuation and spacing adjustments were made throughout the text, such as adding a period after 'disclose' in the definitions.

The definition of 'sexual conduct' was updated to replace 'intercourse' with 'sex' for clarity.

A new exception was added to protect parents, guardians, or custodians from liability when disclosing a child's intimate image, unless the disclosure was for sexual arousal, humiliation, or commercial gain.

The requirements for establishing a cause of action were reorganized to explicitly require proof that the image was private and the individual was identifiable.

The bill title and summary were updated to emphasize 'intentional disclosure or threatened disclosure' rather than general unauthorized disclosure.

Parents and legal guardians are now explicitly exempt from liability for disclosing intimate images of their children, unless the plaintiff proves the disclosure was prohibited by law or the parent knew the content was prohibited.

The definition of 'sexual conduct' was updated to specifically include 'genital, anal, or oral sexual intercourse' instead of the broader term 'sex'.

The burden of proof for parents/guardians was clarified; they are not liable unless the plaintiff proves the disclosure was illegal or the parent knew the content was prohibited.

The bill's short title was updated to include 'limiting use of prior consent' and 'providing for a reasonable expectation of privacy under certain circumstances'.