HB 1067: Medical records; retention; effective date. - Oklahoma

Proposed Committee Substitute (full committee) 1 → Floor (House) · 4 edits

MODERATE

The bill text was completely replaced with a floor version that removes the 'Proposed Oversight Committee Substitute' title and replaces it with a standard 'Committee Substitute' title. The substantive policy language regarding medical record retention, technology usage, and office closure procedures remains identical to the committee version, indicating no changes to the actual law.

TECHNICAL

Removed the title 'Proposed Oversight Committee Substitute' and replaced it with 'Committee Substitute'.

Updated the header text to reflect the House Floor version instead of the Committee version.

Deleted the specific committee amendment signature block and clerk lines.

Added a note indicating that bold face text denotes committee amendments.

House Committee Substitute → Proposed Committee Substitute (full committee) 1 · 3 edits

MINOR

The bill text was completely replaced with a new version that retains the same core medical record retention requirements but updates the internal document tracking numbers and formatting. The substantive policy regarding how long medical records must be kept remains unchanged.

TECHNICAL

The document header was updated to reflect a 'Proposed Oversight Committee Substitute' instead of a standard 'Committee Substitute', indicating a procedural status change.

The bill's requirement number was changed from 13099 to 12920, and the date was updated from March 4, 2025, to February 25, 2025.

Minor formatting adjustments were made to the title and section headers, including the addition of 'PROPOSED OVERSIGHT' and slight line reorganization.

Introduced → House Committee Substitute · 5 edits

MODERATE

The bill was converted from an original introduction to a House Committee Substitute, which includes significant substantive changes to medical record retention rules. The most important change is that health care providers are now explicitly allowed to use microfilm, optical disks, or similar technology to store records and destroy the original paper copies to save space. Additionally, the bill now specifies that records for newborns or minors must be kept until they reach the age of majority, and it clarifies that records reconstituted from digital or microfilm formats count as valid for legal purposes.

Scope change

The scope of the bill was expanded to explicitly authorize alternative storage methods (microfilm, optical disk) and to clarify retention requirements for minors' records until they reach adulthood.

REQUIREMENT

Added explicit permission for health care providers to use microfilm, optical disks, or similar technology to record medical records and destroy the original records to conserve space.

Clarified that records reconstituted from alternative storage technology are legally considered the same as the original records and count toward compliance with preservation laws.

Added a specific requirement that medical records for newborns or minors must be retained until the patient reaches the age of majority.

Added a requirement that health care providers must inform the State Department of Health about the disposition of records if their office closes, ensuring records are handled in a way that protects data integrity.

TECHNICAL

Updated the bill title to reflect it is a 'Committee Substitute' rather than the original 'Introduced' version, indicating it has been amended by the House Committee.

Medical records; retention; effective date.

What changed between versions

How they voted

Actions timeline

Sponsors