Issue · Environment

Environment (Coastal & Flood Protection)

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in North Carolina, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
14
2025-2026 Session
Top supporter
Amy Galey
67% support rate
Top opponent
Dan Blue
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving coastal & flood protection in North Carolina

Legislators moving coastal & flood protection in North Carolina
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Amy Galey
Amy Galey Senate · District 25
R
Support
67% 3
Benton Sawrey
Benton Sawrey Senate · District 10
R
Support
67% 3
Bill Rabon
Bill Rabon Senate · District 8
R
Support
67% 3
Bob Brinson
Bob Brinson Senate · District 3
R
Support
67% 3
Brent Jackson
Brent Jackson Senate · District 9
R
Support
67% 3
Dan Blue
Dan Blue Senate · District 14
D
Strong −
0% 3
Gale Adcock
Gale Adcock Senate · District 16
D
Strong −
0% 3
Gladys Robinson
Gladys Robinson Senate · District 28
D
Strong −
0% 3
Caleb Theodros
Caleb Theodros Senate · District 41
D
Oppose
33% 3
DeAndrea Salvador
DeAndrea Salvador Senate · District 39
D
Oppose
33% 3
Showing 11–14 of 14 bills

All environment bills

in committee · North Carolina · Senate Mar 26, 2025

SB 734: Clarifying Estuarine Waters AEC Under CAMA.

SB 734 clarifies that specific man-made ditches - such as roadside ditches, culverts, and storm channels - are excluded from North Carolina's Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). The bill defines "man-made ditches" in Section 1 and explicitly removes them from CAMA's coverage of estuarine waters, environmental concern areas, and public trust rights under Sections 2, 3, and 4. This means landowners and developers maintaining these ditches will no longer require CAMA permits for them. The bill focuses on clarifying existing law rather than creating new regulations. It directly affects activities involving minor drainage features in coastal zones.
in committee · North Carolina · House Apr 3, 2025

HB 738: Restore Wetlands Protections.

HB 738 restores specific definitions for wetland protections in North Carolina by repealing prior legislative changes and reinstating the 2010 North Carolina Wetland Assessment Manual definitions. It explicitly defines "isolated wetlands" to include those confirmed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers before June 2020 and wetlands classified as basins or bogs under the state's 2010 manual (excluding man-made stormwater features). The bill also clarifies that "wetlands" include waters meeting federal definitions (33 C.F.R. § 328.3 and 40 C.F.R. § 230.3) and the reinstated isolated wetland category. This directly affects developers, landowners, and local governments by determining which projects require wetland permits under state law. The policy change reinstates pre-2020 regulatory boundaries without creating new restrictions.
passed · North Carolina · Senate Jun 18, 2025

SB 639: North Carolina Farm Act of 2025.

SB 639, the North Carolina Farm Act of 2025, updates agricultural water planning, addresses feral swine damage, and strengthens farm conservation protections. It requires the Department of Agriculture to revise the state’s agricultural water plan by 2026, including funding for water infrastructure, conservation practices, and flood mitigation. The bill creates a Feral Swine Working Group with industry and agency representatives to develop control strategies and report annually, while also mandating 100-foot vegetative buffers around protected farm tracts in new subdivisions. Local governments gain authority to deny development permits that would negatively impact agricultural production, directly affecting farmers, landowners, and municipal planning decisions.
in committee · North Carolina · Senate Mar 26, 2025

SB 665: Upland Basin Permitting Reform.

SB 665 streamlines permitting for upland basins (marinas built on elevated land, not open water, that accommodate 10+ vessels) by requiring state agencies to approve applications within 60 days unless specific compliance issues are identified. Projects must meet strict water quality standards (including pre-development dissolved oxygen levels), limit wetland impacts to 5% of basin area, include 30-foot vegetated buffers, and provide bonds covering five years of maintenance costs. This law directly affects developers of these facilities by creating clear environmental requirements and faster approval timelines while aiming to protect coastal resources. The bill establishes measurable standards for development, avoiding vague environmental claims through specific, enforceable criteria.
Showing 11 to 14 of 14 bills