Issue · Environment

Environment

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in North Carolina, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
12
2025-2026 Session
Top supporter
Buck Newton
80% support rate
Top opponent
Gale Adcock
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving environment in North Carolina

Legislators moving environment in North Carolina
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Buck Newton
Buck Newton Senate · District 4
R
Strong +
80% 7
Brad Overcash
Brad Overcash Senate · District 43
R
Strong +
80% 7
Bobby Hanig
Bobby Hanig Senate · District 1
R
Strong +
80% 7
Kevin Corbin
Kevin Corbin Senate · District 50
R
Support
67% 8
Ralph Hise
Ralph Hise Senate · District 47
R
Support
67% 8
Gale Adcock
Gale Adcock Senate · District 16
D
Strong −
0% 8
Gladys Robinson
Gladys Robinson Senate · District 28
D
Strong −
0% 8
Mujtaba Mohammed
Mujtaba Mohammed Senate · District 38
D
Strong −
17% 8
Woodson Bradley
Woodson Bradley Senate · District 42
D
Strong −
20% 7
Caleb Theodros
Caleb Theodros Senate · District 41
D
Strong −
20% 7
Showing 11–12 of 12 bills

All environment bills

passed · North Carolina · Senate May 8, 2025

SB 554: Farmers Protection Act.

The Farmers Protection Act (SB 554) aims to prevent discrimination in financing against agriculture producers. It makes it unlawful for banks to deny or cancel services to farmers based on their greenhouse gas emissions, use of fossil-fuel derived fertilizer, or fossil-fuel powered machinery. If a bank has an environmental, social, or governance (ESG) commitment related to agriculture, there is a rebuttable presumption that such a denial violates the act, unless the bank proves it was solely for financial reasons. The bill requires banks to submit annual compliance reports and allows for civil penalties for violations, which are also considered an unfair or deceptive trade practice.
passed · North Carolina · Senate May 8, 2025

SB 605: IBT Subbasin/TMDL Transport Factor.

SB 605 makes two key changes related to water management and environmental regulations. First, it eliminates subbasin designations and removes the requirement for an Interbasin Transfer certificate for water transfers that occur between subbasins within the same major river basin, simplifying the process for water resource managers. Second, the bill revises how nutrient offset credits are calculated for wastewater permits in the Neuse River Basin. It specifies that a "TMDL transport factor" must be applied to both the permitted wastewater discharge and the nutrient offset credits, and it broadens the applicability of this calculation by removing a previous customer connection limit for local governments. The bill also directs the Department of Environmental Quality to develop new modeling for nutrient transport in the Neuse River Basin, which could lead to updated rules.
Showing 11 to 12 of 12 bills