S 3268 prohibits stores, restaurants, and other public venues from using facial recognition technology on customers, except when needed for genuine safety reasons like preventing violence. It defines "facial recognition" as software that identifies people by face or tracks their movements/emotions, and "legitimate safety purpose" as actions that reduce risks to life or safety. Businesses violating this law face fines up to $20,000 per offense or court-ordered penalties. The bill applies to any public place selling goods or services, including entertainment venues.
This bill requires the New Jersey Supreme Court to automatically dismiss unresolved municipal court charges, complaints, and arrest warrants for specific low-level offenses that have remained pending for five years or longer. It applies to offenses like shoplifting under $200, minor assault, disorderly conduct, and possession of small amounts of marijuana (50g or less), but excludes violations of municipal ordinances. The bill also mandates that the state's Administrative Office of the Courts conduct two studies within six months: one on expanding existing dismissal programs and another on implementing a voluntary surrender program for non-violent offenses. These provisions aim to reduce court backlogs and eliminate outdated legal actions against individuals.
SJR 81, sponsored by Senator Kristin M. Corrado, proposes amending New Jersey's Rules of Evidence to allow prompt reports of sexual assault or employment discrimination to be admitted in court as an exception to the hearsay rule. This means victims' timely reports (made soon after the incident) could be used as evidence without requiring the reporter to testify, helping courts assess credibility and investigative context. The change specifically targets cases involving sexual assault or workplace discrimination, where such reports are currently often excluded as hearsay. The resolution must be approved by the Governor and adopted by the New Jersey Supreme Court to take effect.
This bill would allow judges to admit evidence of a defendant's prior domestic violence, child abuse, or sexual assault offenses in related criminal cases. It directly affects prosecutors and victims in these specific cases by providing additional evidence to support prosecutions when victim testimony is unreliable or unavailable. Currently, New Jersey's evidence rules block such prior acts, making cases harder to prove despite statistics showing 63,058 annual domestic violence reports. The change aligns New Jersey with states like California that permit this evidence to strengthen prosecutions without requiring multiple trials.
This bill (A 340) requires courts to order restitution payments to children who lose a parent or guardian due to a drunk driving incident. It amends New Jersey's vehicular homicide law (N.J.S.2C:11-5) to mandate that when a defendant is convicted of reckless vehicular homicide while driving under the influence (violating N.J.S.39:4-50), the court must order restitution to the child victim. The restitution covers financial losses resulting from the death and is part of the sentencing process, alongside other penalties like license suspension and imprisonment. The bill directly affects children of victims and drunk drivers convicted under these provisions.
This bill prohibits students convicted of or adjudicated for certain sexual assaults (including aggravated sexual assault or sexual contact) from attending the same school building as their victim or riding the same school bus used by the victim. It directly affects public school students in grades K-12 who commit these offenses and are sentenced by a court. The key mechanism requires courts to mandate these prohibitions as part of sentencing, probation, or other legal dispositions. The policy change ensures physical separation between the offender and victim within school facilities and transportation.
The "Ending the Criminal Revolving Door Act" requires New Jersey courts to release first-time offenders charged with third or fourth degree crimes (who have no prior convictions for indictable offenses) on their own recognizance or with non-monetary conditions, rather than monetary bail. This directly affects defendants in these categories by making non-monetary release the default, unless prosecutors provide clear evidence that no conditions would ensure court appearance or community safety. The key mechanism shifts the burden to prosecutors to justify detention, reducing reliance on monetary bail for these specific lower-level offenses.
This bill amends New Jersey's bribery statute (N.J.S.2C:27-2) to clarify that receiving any unauthorized benefit - whether before or after an official act - constitutes bribery. It directly affects public officials, party leaders, and voters who might accept such benefits in exchange for decisions, votes, or official actions. The key change adds that "benefit as consideration" includes payments received at any time relative to the official act, not just before. This update responds to a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that limited similar federal law to pre-act benefits. The amendment ensures New Jersey's law covers all bribery scenarios involving timing of benefits.
Bill S 3340 allows New Jersey counties to establish specialized "central municipal drug courts" to handle drug-related cases. Counties that choose to create such courts would manage cases referred by county health departments, police, or the court system, focusing specifically on drug offenses within their jurisdiction. The bill requires counties to pass an ordinance and file it with the Administrative Director of the Courts to create these courts. This provides an optional framework for counties to develop dedicated court resources for drug-related matters, without mandating any county to implement it.
This bill requires courts to place defendants charged with specific crimes - bail-restricted offenses or vehicular homicide - in pretrial home supervision instead of general release, if they are not detained before trial. It applies when a court orders release under existing law (P.L.2014, c.31) for these offenses. The key provision mandates that home supervision become a standard condition of release, ensuring defendants remain under monitored supervision while awaiting trial. This policy change directly affects individuals facing these charges who would otherwise be released without structured oversight.
