relative to pooled risk management programs.
SB 661 defines key terms and sets financial standards for New Hampshire's pooled risk management programs (which cover health, workers' compensation, and property/casualty insurance for political subdivisions like cities and towns). It requires programs to maintain minimum reserve levels (4% of annual health claims or 10% of annual contributions for workers' comp), triggers mandatory assessments if reserves fall below these thresholds, and mandates annual audits and actuarial reviews. The bill also establishes a "health care stabilization fund" requirement for health coverage members to cover potential future assessments. These provisions directly affect participating political subdivisions by setting clear financial safeguards and accountability measures for the pooled programs.
Bill status
vetoed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
House Failed
Aug 2026
Vetoed
Aug 2026
Introduced Feb 4, 2026
Vetoed Aug 19, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
As Amended by the Senate
→
Version adopted by both bodies
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill text has been updated to reflect the final version adopted by both legislative chambers, replacing the previous Senate-only amendment version. The substantive content regarding pooled risk management programs remains consistent, with only minor formatting adjustments and a truncated line at the end of the provided text.
TECHNICAL
The document header was changed from 'As Amended by the Senate' to 'Version Adopted by Both Bodies', indicating the bill has passed both legislative houses.
Minor formatting adjustments were made to the date line and page headers to align with the final adopted format.
A line break or truncation occurred at the end of the provided text, cutting off the word 'required' in the definition of 'Contingency reserves'.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2026 · House Aug 19, 2026
How they voted
23–1
Passed
Total votes 24
Aug 19, 2026
D
Democratic8
100% Yea
R
Republican16
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Aug 19, 2026
Vetoed
Veto Sustained 08/19/2026: RC 84-216 Lacking Necessary Two-Thirds Vote HJ 16
lower
Aug 19, 2026
Vetoed
Notwithstanding the Governor's Veto, Shall SB 661 Become Law: RC 23Y-1N, Veto Overridden by necessary two-thirds vote; 08/19/2026; SJ 15
upper
Aug 19, 2026
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-1)
senate
Jun 24, 2026
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor 06/19/2026
upper
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
Ought to Pass: MA VV 05/14/2026 HJ 13 P. 11
lower
May 7, 2026
Lower · Passed
Committee Report: Ought to Pass 05/06/2026 (Vote 18-0; CC) HC 19 P. 11
lower
Apr 29, 2026
Lower · Passed
Subcommittee Work Session: 05/06/2026 10:00 am GP 229
lower
Apr 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
Subcommittee Work Session: 04/22/2026 10:00 am GP 229
lower
Mar 27, 2026
Introduced
Introduced (in recess of) 03/26/2026 and referred to Commerce and Consumer Affairs HJ 9 P. 55
lower
Mar 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Ought to Pass with Amendment #2026-1208s, MA, VV; OT3rdg; 03/26/2026; SJ 7
upper
Mar 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee Amendment # 2026-1208s, AA, VV; 03/26/2026; SJ 7
upper
Mar 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-1208s, 03/26/2026; Vote 5-0; CC; SC 11
upper
Feb 4, 2026
Introduced
Introduced 01/29/2026 and Referred to Finance; SJ 3
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 661
Scope: NH
Hi! I can help you understand SB 661. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline