requiring legislative approval of the amendment or permanent removal of historical markers.
HB 1097 requires the joint legislature fiscal committee to approve any amendment or permanent removal of a historical marker. Currently, the placement of new markers requires approval from the state historic preservation office, but this bill adds a legislative review step for changes to existing markers. The commissioner of the department of natural and cultural resources must now seek this committee's approval before altering or removing a marker. The policy directly affects the state agency managing historical markers by shifting decision-making authority to the legislature.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2025
Committee Review
May 2026
House Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Vetoed
Aug 2026
Introduced Dec 1, 2025
Vetoed Aug 19, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
As Amended by the House
→
Version adopted by both bodies
·
2 edits
MINOR
The bill has been finalized for adoption by both legislative chambers, updating the title to reflect this status. The document version date has been updated to April 9, 2026, and the session number remains consistent. No substantive policy changes, such as new funding amounts, eligibility criteria, or legal definitions, are present in the provided text.
TECHNICAL
The document title was updated from 'As Amended by the House' to 'Version Adopted by Both Bodies' to indicate the bill has passed both chambers.
The document header date was updated to 04/09 (April 9) to reflect the final adoption date.
Floor votes · House Aug 19, 2026
How they voted
109–73
Passed · 32 other
Total votes 214
Aug 19, 2026
D
Democratic101
70% Nay
I
Independent2
50% Yea
R
Republican111
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Aug 19, 2026
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (109-73-32)
house
Aug 19, 2026
Vetoed
Veto Sustained 08/19/2026: RC 193-125 Lacking Necessary Two-Thirds Vote HJ 16
lower
Jun 24, 2026
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor Ayotte 06/19/2026
lower
May 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Ought to Pass: MA, VV; OT3rdg; 05/07/2026; SJ 11
upper
Apr 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee Report: Ought to Pass, 05/07/2026; Vote 5-0; CC; SC 17
upper
Mar 17, 2026
Introduced
Introduced 03/12/2026 and Referred to Executive Departments and Administration; SJ 7
upper
Mar 11, 2026
Lower · Passed
Ought to Pass with Amendment 2026-0503h: MA VV 03/11/2026 HJ 7 P. 55
lower
Mar 11, 2026
Introduced
Amendment # 2026-0503h: AA VV 03/11/2026 HJ 7 P. 55
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-0503h 02/25/2026 (Vote 10-0; CC) HC 10 P. 27
lower
Feb 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
Full Committee Work Session: 02/25/2026 09:00 am GP 234
lower
Dec 1, 2025
Introduced
Introduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Legislative Administration HJ 1 P. 6
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Greg Hill
RRepublican
Co
Howard Pearl
RRepublican
Co
Kevin Avard
RRepublican
Co
Tim Lang
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1097
Scope: NH
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1097. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline