SB 186 requires Nevada medical facilities and providers using generative artificial intelligence (AI) to create written or verbal communications about a patient’s clinical care to include two specific elements: a clear disclaimer stating the communication was AI-generated, and instructions on how to contact a real provider for assistance. It specifies where disclaimers must appear (e.g., prominently at the start of written messages, throughout chat-based telehealth, or at both ends of audio calls). Communications reviewed and approved by a healthcare provider before sharing with patients are exempt from these requirements. The law applies to all medical facilities and providers covered under Nevada’s existing healthcare regulations, with enforcement through standard disciplinary actions for noncompliance.
This bill proposes adding a new constitutional right to reproductive freedom in Nevada, guaranteeing all residents the right to make decisions about pregnancy care - including abortion, birth control, and miscarriage management - without government interference. It allows state regulation of abortion after fetal viability only if necessary to protect the pregnant person’s life or health, and explicitly prohibits penalties against individuals, healthcare providers, or entities aiding reproductive care. The amendment requires approval by two consecutive legislatures and a statewide vote to take effect. It directly affects all Nevadans seeking reproductive healthcare and healthcare providers offering such services.
SB 2 clarifies procedures for managing the Legislative Fund and the Legislative Counsel Bureau. It requires that proceeds from food or souvenir sales in legislative buildings be deposited into the Legislative Fund (instead of other accounts) and specifies how petty cash for these operations must be handled. The bill also explicitly states that the Legislative Counsel’s work organizing Nevada’s statutes by subject matter - required by law - is not a legislative decision about which government entities belong to which branch. These changes aim to resolve confusion highlighted in a recent Nevada Supreme Court case about the separation of government powers.
SB 37 prohibits "road rage" by defining it as either committing assault against another driver or operating a vehicle to intimidate, harass, frighten, alarm, or distress another driver on public roads or premises. It directly affects drivers who engage in these behaviors, classifying first offenses as misdemeanors (with fines up to $1,000, community service, or up to 6 months in jail) and repeat offenses as gross misdemeanors (with higher fines, 200 hours of community service, and up to 364 days in jail). Key penalties include license suspension for 6 months to 2 years, vehicle impoundment for 15-30 days, and mandatory community service. The bill amends Nevada law to add this specific prohibition and establish graduated penalties for violations.
SB 129 simplifies licensing for professionals moving to Nevada by requiring regulatory bodies to issue licenses by endorsement without needing separate rules. It directly affects out-of-state professionals (e.g., doctors, engineers) who hold valid, unrestricted licenses in another U.S. state or territory for at least one year. The bill mandates applicants must be Nevada residents, meet educational/exam requirements, and have no recent license suspensions or disciplinary actions in their prior jurisdiction. This replaces previous requirements that forced regulatory boards to create specific endorsement regulations.
SB 394 prohibits the sale of fireworks to anyone under 18 years old, directly affecting retailers who must verify customer age and minors attempting to purchase fireworks. It amends county ordinance rules to ensure local regulations align with this age restriction, requiring that county or city ordinances about fireworks sales cannot conflict with the under-18 ban. The bill also establishes specific civil penalty ranges for violations, from $250-$1,000 for small quantities to $5,000-$10,000 for large-scale offenses. These changes apply to all counties and cities in Nevada where fireworks sales are regulated. The bill does not alter existing licensing requirements for retailers but mandates that penalties consider prior violations.
SB 200 allows counties with populations under 9,000 (like Esmeralda, Eureka, and Storey) to seek reimbursement from the state for costs incurred when hosting large, tax-exempt live entertainment events. Specifically, if a nonprofit religious or charitable organization holds an event with 15,000+ tickets in one of these counties, the county can apply for reimbursement of direct costs (e.g., security, permits) related to the event. The bill sets clear limits: counties cannot claim costs already paid by the event organizer, indirect costs are capped at 20% of direct costs, and total annual reimbursement cannot exceed $750,000. Applications must be submitted within 90 days after the event and reviewed by the Department of Taxation before approval by the Nevada Tax Commission.
SB 77 revises the Department of Transportation's (DOT) procedures for highway projects, directly affecting the DOT's internal operations and contractors bidding on projects. It increases the minimum project cost requiring a written cost-benefit analysis from $25 million to $50 million, eliminates the need for Board approval when using informal bidding or hiring during emergencies, and raises the maximum project cost for informal bidding from $250,000 to $750,000. The bill also shifts advertising requirements from newspapers to online posting for bids and preliminary proposals, and changes when contractors must prove their qualifications (before submitting bids instead of before receiving project plans). These changes aim to streamline contracting processes and reduce administrative steps for the DOT.
SB 94 would exempt Nevada from federal rules requiring the biannual clock changes for daylight saving time. The bill allows Nevada to remain on Pacific Standard Time year-round instead of switching clocks in March and November. This directly affects Nevada's state government and all local jurisdictions, which would no longer need to observe the seasonal time adjustments. The exemption is based on existing federal law (15 U.S.C. § 260a) that permits states to opt out of daylight saving time requirements.
SB 51 creates a state reimbursement program for cities and counties that reduce or subsidize specific fees to support affordable housing projects. It establishes a $20 million "Account for Housing Expansion Through Local Partnerships" in the State General Fund to reimburse local governments for costs incurred when lowering impact fees, building permit fees, or enterprise fund fees. Local jurisdictions must meet housing element requirements under NRS 278.235 and provide proof of fee reductions and completed housing projects to qualify. The reimbursement process requires review by the Housing Division, State Board of Examiners, and final approval by the Interim Finance Committee before funds are distributed.
SB 112 requires public and private schools (and colleges) to designate athletic teams based solely on biological sex at birth as "for males," "for females," or "for both," and prohibits allowing participation by members of the opposite sex in single-gender teams. It clarifies that complying with these designations does not constitute sex-based discrimination under state law and protects schools from adverse actions by athletic associations for maintaining separate teams. The bill also establishes civil actions for students or schools to address violations or retaliation related to these provisions. These rules apply to both K-12 schools and institutions of higher education.
This bill requires judges in Clark County (Nevada's only county with over 700,000 people) to appoint deputy marshals instead of bailiffs for district and justice courts. Before appointing, judges must first check if qualified county employees are available for the position. Once appointed, deputy marshals become county employees but serve at the judge’s discretion (meaning judges can terminate their court role anytime without cause) and are not subject to regular county employee rules while working in court. If a judge ends a deputy marshal’s court service, they remain a county employee but lose their court position, with continued employment governed by standard county policies.
