Issue · Environment

Environment (Wildlife)

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Montana, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
47
2025 Regular Session
Top supporter
Dave Fern
96% support rate
Top opponent
Becky Beard
9% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving wildlife in Montana

Legislators moving wildlife in Montana
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Dave Fern
Dave Fern Senate · District 2
D
Strong +
96% 23
Janet Ellis
Janet Ellis Senate · District 41
D
Strong +
96% 23
Mary Ann Dunwell
Mary Ann Dunwell Senate · District 42
D
Strong +
96% 23
Emma Kerr-Carpenter
Emma Kerr-Carpenter Senate · District 23
D
Strong +
95% 22
Susan Webber
Susan Webber Senate · District 8
D
Strong +
95% 22
Becky Beard
Becky Beard Senate · District 38
R
Strong −
9% 23
Dennis Lenz
Dennis Lenz Senate · District 25
R
Strong −
17% 23
Ken Bogner
Ken Bogner Senate · District 18
R
Strong −
17% 23
Carl Glimm
Carl Glimm Senate · District 3
R
Strong −
18% 22
Daniel Emrich
Daniel Emrich Senate · District 11
R
Oppose
22% 23
Showing 41–47 of 47 bills

All environment bills

died · Montana · Senate May 23, 2025

SB 427: Provide trapping setback distances for certain roads and trails

SB 427 establishes minimum distance requirements for trapping on Montana's public lands near developed areas. It requires trappers to set traps at least 50 feet from roads/trails, 1,000 feet from campgrounds/recreation sites (including boat ramps), and 300 feet from trailheads (with 1,000 feet for lethal traps). The bill directly affects trappers operating on public lands, particularly those near popular recreation areas, and gives the Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission authority to adjust these distances in high-use zones. The provisions aim to reduce conflicts between trapping activities and public recreation by creating physical buffers around developed sites.
Sub-Topics Public Lands Wildlife
died · Montana · House May 20, 2025

HB 101: Reclassify wolves as furbearers and align existing wolf tagging and furbearer hunting restrictions

HB 101 reclassifies gray wolves as furbearers, integrating them into existing furbearer hunting and trapping regulations. The bill establishes specific wolf hunting licenses for residents and nonresidents, outlining associated fees and tagging requirements for harvested wolves. It introduces new management provisions, allowing for more liberal harvest opportunities such as multiple licenses per individual, the use of bait for trapping, and night hunting on private lands. Additionally, the bill permits landowners to take wolves threatening human safety, livestock, or dogs on their property without a license under specific reporting requirements and a quota.
Sub-Topics Wildlife
died · Montana · House May 22, 2025

HB 258: Requiring the extension of wolf hunting season

House Bill 258 (HB 258) aimed to revise laws concerning wolf hunting in Montana. The bill would have required the Fish and Wildlife Commission to authorize an annual wolf hunting season. Its main provision was to extend this wolf hunting season to conclude concurrently with the spring bear hunting season, allowing for specific regional adjustments by the commission. This legislation would have directly impacted wolf hunters and the state's wildlife management policies for wolves.
Sub-Topics Wildlife
signed · Montana · House Sep 29, 2025

HB 259: Revise fish and wildlife commission techniques for gray wolf management

HB 259 revises Montana's gray wolf management rules to give the Fish and Wildlife Commission more flexibility in controlling wolf populations. It allows landowners to kill wolves threatening livestock or safety without a hunting license (subject to reporting and annual quotas), expands hunting/trapping on private land at night using thermal/infrared scopes, and permits unlimited wolf harvest in high-population areas. The bill directly affects landowners, hunters, and the Fish and Wildlife Commission, which must implement these changes. Key provisions include new landowner take rules, modified hunting seasons based on regional wolf numbers, and immediate implementation upon enactment.
Sub-Topics Wildlife
introduced · Montana · Legislature Mar 30, 2025

LC 1608: Generally revise conservation financing laws

Montana's LC 1608 establishes a Habitat Legacy Account funded by marijuana revenue to support wildlife conservation. It allocates 75% of annual funds to the Land and Wildlife Stewardship Account for habitat acquisition, 20% to the Wildlife Habitat Improvement Account for projects, and 5% to the Big Game Highway Crossings Account for wildlife crossing infrastructure. If the Stewardship Account exceeds $50 million in unused funds, allocations shift to 80% for improvement projects and 20% for crossings. The Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks administers all accounts, with funds restricted to specific conservation purposes like habitat protection, wildlife projects, and highway crossing design.
signed · Montana · House May 19, 2025

HB 932: Generally revise conservation financing laws

House Bill 932 revises laws related to funding for conservation efforts, primarily by reallocating a portion of the state's marijuana tax revenue. The bill establishes a new Habitat Legacy Account, which receives 20% of the net balance from the Marijuana State Special Revenue Account after an initial transfer. Funds from this Habitat Legacy Account are then distributed into three other new accounts. These accounts are dedicated to securing wildlife habitat, funding wildlife improvement projects, and supporting the design and construction of big game and wildlife highway crossings to enhance animal movement and safety. The Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks is responsible for administering these new accounts.
Sub-Topics Conservation Wildlife
passed · Montana · House May 1, 2025

HR 6: Resolution on the protection of November mule deer hunt

This resolution from the Montana House of Representatives urges the state's Fish and Wildlife Commission to protect the traditional November mule deer hunt. It specifically asks the Commission to retain the current timing of the hunt, including the opportunity to harvest bucks during the rut, and to avoid moving the season earlier into October. The resolution also recommends restricting antlerless mule deer harvest in areas with declining populations. Furthermore, it suggests guidelines for any buck harvest restrictions, such as limiting their scope to a maximum of 20% of districts and incorporating biological triggers like buck-to-doe ratios.
Sub-Topics Wildlife
Showing 41 to 47 of 47 bills
Previous 1 3 4 5