SB 343 would change how Montana allocates remaining coal severance tax revenue after other specified uses. Currently, until 2027, interest income from the coal trust fund is sent to the general fund for specific programs like agriculture development, small business centers, and library services. This bill amends the law to redirect all remaining coal tax revenue (after other allocations) directly to the coal severance tax permanent fund starting July 1, 2027, instead of the general fund. The policy change would shift funding away from current general fund programs toward the coal trust fund, which supports coal-dependent communities and projects.
SB 546 would have created an income-based tax credit for Montana taxpayers with low-to-moderate income, reducing their state tax liability. The credit would have been calculated as 4.7% of taxable income up to specific thresholds ($2,000 for joint filers, $1,500 for heads of household, and $1,000 for other filers), phasing out by 0.094% for each additional $1,000-$2,000 of income depending on filing status. It would not have applied to income above phaseout limits, and the credit could not exceed the taxpayer’s total tax liability. The bill died in committee on May 23, 2025, and was never enacted.
SB 405 proposed transferring $50 million from Montana's general fund to the Housing Montana Fund within 15 days of enactment, directly supporting state housing programs and affordable housing initiatives. It required the Department of Commerce to update administrative rules related to housing by the start of the 70th legislative session. The bill would have taken effect July 1, 2025, but died in committee on May 23, 2025, after being tabled in April 2025. This was a substantive funding bill, not a procedural measure, with no further legislative action taken.
SB 99 amends Montana tax law to treat certain rental and accommodations income earned by tax-exempt organizations as "unrelated business income" subject to taxation. This affects nonprofits and other exempt groups that previously did not pay tax on such income, including short-term rentals or property leasing activities. The bill creates new reporting requirements for these organizations and specifies how to calculate the tax based on Montana’s existing tax rates and sourcing rules. It modifies existing statutes to clarify that this income must now be included in taxable income calculations, rather than remaining exempt. The change applies to income generated from business activities unrelated to the organization’s exempt purpose.
HB 848 aimed to provide dedicated funding for regional rail authorities in the state. The bill proposed creating a "Big Sky Rail Account" within the state special revenue fund, which would receive a portion of rental car sales and use tax proceeds. The Department of Transportation would then annually distribute these funds to eligible regional rail authorities. These authorities could use the money for administrative costs, matching federal grants, fostering partnerships, and planning, developing, and operating rail projects and services, such as enhancing safety, improving stations, and exploring new train routes.
HB 560 would have established a Montana Hunters' and Anglers' Community Fund, allowing donors to contribute $1 or more above the cost of wildlife conservation licenses. Funds collected would support grants for small rural communities (under 7,500 people) through the Department of Commerce, including projects like school improvements, food banks, or student programs. Grants would be limited to $2,000 (small) or $20,000 (large), with eligibility restrictions barring political activities and entities involved in lawsuits. The bill created a review board appointed by legislative leaders and the governor, and it died in committee in May 2025 without becoming law.
HB 313 aimed to establish a grant program to provide funding for public swimming pools operated by local governments and nonprofit organizations. It would have created a "public swimming pool infrastructure account" and appropriated $5 million from the state general fund, to be administered by the Department of Commerce. These grants were intended to support capital construction, maintenance, repair projects, and equipment purchases for eligible aquatic facilities. Grants of $25,000 or more would have required a 1:5 match, and funding was limited to $1 million per county and $500,000 per project.
HB 528 revises Montana property tax rates for agricultural, residential, and commercial property. It lowers the tax rate for class three agricultural land from 2.16% to 1.7% of its productive capacity value, and reduces the tax rate for class four residential property from 1.35% to 0.76% of market value. Commercial property rates remain at 1.35% of market value but include specific adjustments for properties over $1.5 million in value. The bill applies retroactively to tax years beginning after December 31, 2024, and the 2025 reappraisal cycle.
HB 155 revises property tax laws for Class Four residential and commercial properties. For residential properties, it introduces a graduated tax rate for single-family homes above $1.5 million in market value and sets specific rates for vacant residential lots under $50,000 and certain rental multifamily units over $2 million. For commercial and industrial properties, the bill exempts the first $200,000 of market value from taxation and establishes specific tax rates for the remaining value, with a different rate for golf courses. The bill would have taken effect immediately and applied retroactively to property tax years beginning after December 31, 2024.
HB 451 revises how tax increment financing (TIF) is calculated for newly established targeted economic development districts and urban renewal areas. For districts created after the bill's effective date, it excludes several specific mill levies from the tax increment calculation. These exclusions include certain university system mills, a portion of elementary, high school, and state equalization mills, new voter-approved levies, and mills for general obligation bond debt service. This means that a larger share of the new property tax revenue generated in these areas would directly go to the affected taxing jurisdictions, rather than into the TIF fund.
