HB 1845 creates the Missouri Angel Investment Incentive Act, offering tax credits to qualified investors who provide cash investments to eligible Missouri businesses. The bill directly affects accredited investors (including those meeting federal JOBS Act criteria) and "qualified Missouri businesses" approved by the Missouri Technology Corporation (MTC) as tech-focused companies operating in designated geographic regions across Missouri. Key provisions include tax credits equal to 25% of qualifying investments (up to $100,000 per investor annually) for businesses meeting location criteria - either domiciled in Missouri or primarily operating within the state. The law excludes investors who are executives, officers, or employees of the business they invest in, but allows directors to qualify for credits.
HB 1747 requires anyone publishing AI-generated or AI-modified images, videos, or audio to include a clear, visible, or audible label stating the content was created or altered using artificial intelligence. This applies to all publishers and disseminators of such content, including social media platforms, news outlets, and other entities. The bill creates a legal right for individuals who suffer harm due to a failure to label such content to sue the publisher for damages. The label must be developed by the secretary of state and used consistently across all AI-generated media.
HB 2324 prohibits Missouri automobile insurers from purchasing or obtaining vehicle driving data (like location, speed, or braking patterns) without the explicit, written consent of the vehicle owner or primary driver. Insurers must disclose what data they collect, how it's gathered, and how it may affect premiums before obtaining consent. The bill also bans insurers from denying coverage, canceling policies, or raising premiums solely because an owner refuses to share driving data, and requires insurers to provide owners with copies of their collected data upon request. Enforcement is handled by Missouri's Department of Commerce and Insurance, which can impose fines for violations.
HB 2147 prohibits using false caller ID information (call spoofing) to deceive recipients during telemarketing calls, specifically banning tactics that misrepresent the caller's identity to defraud, harass, or obtain value. It establishes a state "no-call database" managed by the Attorney General, allowing Missouri business and residential subscribers to register to block unwanted telemarketing calls at no cost. The law requires callers to clearly identify themselves at the start of each solicitation and prohibits blocking caller ID services. This applies to telemarketing calls (e.g., sales pitches) but includes exceptions for calls with prior permission, recent business contacts, or non-profit fundraising.
HB 2606 strengthens patient control over health records by requiring healthcare providers to obtain explicit, written patient consent before sharing health information, except during medical emergencies. It prohibits providers from conditioning treatment on consent, banning blanket consent forms for research, and mandating specific patient authorization for any use of health data. The bill also establishes civil penalties, allowing patients to recover $1,000-$10,000 per violation for unauthorized disclosures or lack of proper consent. This directly affects patients (who gain ownership rights) and healthcare providers (who must follow strict disclosure rules).
HB 1887 creates civil penalties for the unauthorized disclosure of "intimate digital depictions," which are defined as digitally altered images showing genitals, pubic areas, sexual conduct, or bodily fluids. It directly affects individuals whose intimate digital images are shared without their valid consent, including minors and those with diminished capacity. Key provisions require written consent in plain language for disclosure, allow civil lawsuits for damages (including up to $150,000 in liquidated damages), and permit court-ordered injunctions to stop further disclosure. The law excludes disclosures made in good faith to law enforcement or in legal proceedings.
HB 1746 declares AI systems non-sentient entities under state law and assigns legal responsibility for their actions to humans. It prohibits AI from holding legal personhood, marriage rights, corporate roles, or owning property - requiring all assets and liability to remain with owners, developers, or users. The bill mandates owners to maintain oversight for AI systems impacting safety, holds developers liable only for design defects (not misuse), and prevents companies from evading accountability through shell entities. It applies to all AI developed after August 28, 2026, and requires prompt reporting of severe incidents involving AI.
HB 2305 requires Missouri local governments (like counties and cities) to allow contractors to submit bids electronically for publicly funded construction projects (e.g., roads, bridges, public buildings). It mandates that political subdivisions use secure online platforms for bid submissions, publish notices on public websites or e-procurement systems, and implement security measures like digital signatures and encryption to protect bid confidentiality. The bill also requires electronic receipts for bidders showing submission time and ensures public access to bids at opening. These changes apply to all local governments handling qualifying construction projects, effective after the Office of Administration issues implementation guidelines within one year.
HB 2220 authorizes Missouri's Department of Transportation (DOT) to form public-private partnerships with broadband providers to expand the state's fiber network. It requires the DOT to prioritize unserved and underserved areas (defined in state law) and use a competitive bidding process with specific public notice requirements in local newspapers and tech publications. Private partners can use excess fiber capacity to offer internet services meeting state broadband standards, while the DOT must follow state rulemaking procedures. The bill creates a structured framework for expanding rural and low-access broadband infrastructure through DOT-led partnerships.
HB 1931 requires arrest warrants issued for crimes in Missouri to remain private in electronic court systems until the arrest is actually made. This affects law enforcement agencies and courts that use digital case management tools, preventing public or unauthorized access to warrant details before an arrest occurs. The bill amends Missouri law (RSMo § 544.076) to ensure warrant information is not visible online until execution, overriding conflicting court rules about case record access. It directly changes how warrant data is handled in Missouri’s electronic systems, focusing on confidentiality during the pre-arrest phase.
