Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Courts)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Missouri, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
73
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
-
no data yet
Top opponent
-
no data yet
Ranked legislators
0
0 support · 0 oppose
Showing 51–60 of 73 bills

All criminal justice bills

in committee · Missouri · House Apr 8, 2026

HB 2255: Modifies provisions relating to expert witnesses

HB 2255 revises Missouri's rules for expert witness testimony in court. For most cases (excluding family, juvenile, probate, and non-jury trials), it requires that expert opinions must be based on reliable methods, sufficient facts, and a reliable application of those methods to the specific case. In criminal cases, the bill prohibits experts from opining on whether a defendant had a mental state that constitutes an element of the crime. This affects all legal proceedings in Missouri that rely on expert testimony, ensuring greater scrutiny of such evidence in most courtroom settings.
passed · Missouri · House Apr 21, 2026

HB 1664: Modifies provisions relating to statutes of limitation

HB 1664 extends the time window for survivors of childhood sexual abuse to file civil lawsuits in Missouri. It allows claims to be filed within 20 years after turning 21 or within 3 years of discovering the abuse caused their injury, whichever is later. The bill also voids any nondisclosure agreements in these cases, making them unenforceable in court. This applies to actions arising on or after January 1, 2026, directly affecting survivors seeking legal recourse for abuse occurring before age 18.
Sub-Topics Courts
in committee · Missouri · House May 15, 2026

HB 1971: Modifies provisions relating to certain privileged information

HB 1971 modifies Missouri's laws regarding privileged information in probation and parole cases. It requires court clerks to maintain permanent records of probation/parole applications and presentence investigations, and establishes that information gathered by probation officers is "privileged" - meaning it cannot be used in court except for lawful criminal matters. The bill includes an exception allowing presentence investigation reports to be shared with the state at a court's discretion if deemed necessary for the state's interests. This directly affects probation officers, courts, defendants, and the state in handling sensitive case information. The bill replaces Section 559.125 of Missouri law with these clarified provisions.
in committee · Missouri · House Mar 25, 2026

HB 2323: Establishes the "Missouri Domestic Abuse Offender Registration and Accountability Act"

HB 2323 establishes Missouri's "Domestic Abuse Offender Registration and Accountability Act," requiring high-risk domestic abuse offenders (those with two prior convictions or a high-risk assessment) to register with the Department of Public Safety. Offenders must provide detailed personal, residential, employment, and vehicle information within 72 hours of conviction or release, update details within 10 days of changes, and maintain registration for five years post-sentence. The law mandates court hearings before registration orders, restricts database access to law enforcement for victim safety (not public disclosure), and requires victim notification before sharing offender data. Violations carry civil fines for first offenses and misdemeanor penalties for repeat failures, with biennial reports to the legislature on registry effectiveness.
in committee · Missouri · Senate Apr 8, 2026

SB 1103: Creates provisions relating to lifetime protection orders

SB 1103 (Missouri Senate Bill 1103) creates a new legal provision requiring courts to automatically issue lifetime protection orders at sentencing for defendants convicted of dangerous felonies (as defined in Section 556.061). These orders immediately restrict contact between the defendant and the victim and remain in effect for the defendant's lifetime unless the victim dies, the conviction is overturned, or the victim submits a written request for termination. The bill mandates that law enforcement agencies enter these orders into Missouri's MULES system within 24 hours and forward them to national databases (NCIC/NICS), including any child custody details specified in the order. This directly affects victims of dangerous felony convictions, convicted defendants, and law enforcement agencies responsible for implementing the orders.
in committee · Missouri · House May 15, 2026

HB 2344: Modifies laws regarding public nuisances

HB 2344 protects tenants, landlords, and residents who contact law enforcement or emergency services to address abuse, crime, or emergencies. It prohibits local governments from penalizing these individuals through eviction, license revocation, fines, or other penalties for making such requests when done with a reasonable belief that intervention was necessary. The bill allows affected individuals to sue local governments for violations and seek remedies like court orders halting penalties, compensation for damages, and reinstatement of rental licenses. This directly affects people in housing situations who report safety concerns, ensuring they cannot be punished for seeking help.
Sub-Topics Courts Law Enforcement Landlords Tenant Rights Tags Public Safety
in committee · Missouri · Senate Jan 15, 2026

SB 1109: Repeals provisions relating to the caseload of public defenders

SB 1109 replaces Missouri's existing public defender caseload rules with a new process allowing individual public defenders to request court conferences when caseloads threaten their ability to provide effective legal representation. If approved, the presiding judge must schedule a conference within 30 days and may order specific relief, such as appointing private counsel, modifying release conditions, or placing cases on a waiting list based on urgency. The bill requires the prosecutor and public defender to be notified of the conference and allows a 10-day window for an expedited appeal to higher court. It directly affects individual public defenders and defendants in cases where caseloads create representation challenges, focusing on addressing specific, immediate concerns rather than setting office-wide caseload limits.
Sub-Topics Courts Judges
in committee · Missouri · House May 15, 2026

HB 2193: Creates extreme risk orders of protection

HB 2193 creates a legal process for courts to issue emergency "extreme risk orders" restricting gun access when someone poses an immediate risk of harming themselves or others. Law enforcement can request an immediate court order (ex parte) without prior notice if there's an urgent danger, requiring the person to surrender all firearms within 24 hours. A full hearing must occur within 15 days, and if the risk is proven by a preponderance of evidence, a one-year order is issued. This directly affects individuals identified as high-risk by law enforcement, with special provisions for minors under 18, who are transferred to juvenile court.
in committee · Missouri · House May 15, 2026

HB 2186: Modifies provisions relating to trial procedures for murder in the first degree

HB 2186 changes how first-degree murder trials are conducted when the death penalty is an option. It requires a two-stage trial: first to determine guilt, then to decide punishment. If the defendant is found guilty of first-degree murder without a death penalty waiver, the second stage focuses solely on sentencing, with life imprisonment without parole mandated if the court finds intellectual disability, no aggravating circumstances, or sufficient mitigating evidence outweighing aggravation. This bill affects defendants charged with first-degree murder in cases where the death penalty is sought, applying only to offenses committed on or after August 28, 2001.
in committee · Missouri · Senate Jan 27, 2026

SB 1170: Creates provisions relating to compensation for wrongful convictions

This bill (SB 1170) aims to establish new legal procedures for compensating individuals wrongfully convicted of crimes. However, the provided context does not include specific details about the compensation amounts, eligibility criteria, or the exact process for claiming compensation. Without additional information on the bill's concrete provisions, mechanisms, or affected parties, a substantive summary cannot be generated. The official abstract only states the bill "creates provisions relating to compensation for wrongful convictions" without describing how these provisions would function.
Showing 51 to 60 of 73 bills
Previous 1 5 6 7 8 Next