Issue · Labor & Employment

Labor & Employment

Every labor & employment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Michigan, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

MI Legislature US Congress

Total bills

2025-2026 Regular Session

Top supporter

Jeremy Moss

93% support rate

Top opponent

Michele Hoitenga

13% support rate

Ranked legislators

5 support · 5 oppose

Legislator filter Clear

Sen. Aric Nesbitt District 20

Session

Filter bills

All (20) For (9) Against (11)

11 bills · labor & employment
Refreshed weekly

Key legislators

Who's moving labor & employment in Michigan

Legislators moving labor & employment in Michigan
Legislator	Party	Stance	Support rate	Decisive votes
Jeremy Moss Senate · District 7	D	Strong +	93%	15
Kevin Hertel Senate · District 12	D	Strong +	93%	15
Paul Wojno Senate · District 10	D	Strong +	93%	15
Sam Singh Senate · District 28	D	Strong +	93%	15
Veronica Klinefelt Senate · District 11	D	Strong +	93%	15
Michele Hoitenga Senate · District 36	R	Strong −	13%	15
Thomas Albert Senate · District 18	R	Strong −	13%	15
Jim Runestad Senate · District 23	R	Strong −	14%	14
Jon Bumstead Senate · District 32	R	Strong −	14%	14
Ruth Johnson Senate · District 24	R	Strong −	17%	12

Showing 11–11 of 11 bills

All labor & employment bills

passed · Michigan · Senate Apr 17, 2025

SB 34: Civil rights: sex discrimination and harassment; definition of sex; modify to include lactating status for employment situations and include pregnancy and lactating status for places of public accommodation or public service. Amends secs. 201 & 301 of 1976 PA 453 (MCL 37.2201 & 37.2301).

Senate Bill 34 amends Michigan's Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act to broaden the definition of "sex." For employment situations, it clarifies that "sex" includes pregnancy, lactating status, childbirth, termination of a pregnancy, or related medical conditions. For places of public accommodation and public service, the bill specifies that "sex" includes pregnancy or lactating status. This bill aims to expand civil rights protections for individuals based on these defined statuses.

Topics ✓ Healthcare ✓ Labor & Employment | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✗ Opposes Labor & Employment