By Representative Jones of North Reading, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2291) of Bradley H. Jones, Jr. and others relative to allowing municipalities to appeal zoning provisions under the MBTA Communities Act, so-called. Municipalities and Regional Government.
This bill allows communities designated as "adjacent" under the MBTA Communities Act to request a review of their status. Specifically, it permits these communities to submit written petitions to the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities, providing evidence that their designation creates undue burdens due to insufficient infrastructure or resources. The state office must then develop regulations outlining how to assess these petitions and decide whether to modify a community's designation. This creates a formal process for communities to seek relief from MBTA community requirements they argue are impractical to meet. The bill directly affects municipalities currently classified as "adjacent" under the MBTA Communities Act.
This bill exempts Massachusetts municipalities with an area under two square miles from certain requirements of the MBTA Communities Act. It directly affects small towns, such as some rural or densely developed communities, by removing their obligation to comply with specific zoning and housing provisions. The key mechanism adds a new exemption clause (subsection d) to the existing law, creating a clear size-based exception. This change modifies the law's application without altering the core purpose of the MBTA Communities Act.
This bill restricts accessory dwelling units (ADUs, or secondary homes) in single-family zoning districts with lots 10,000 square feet or smaller. It requires ADUs to be owner-occupied and limited to extended family members living there. Municipalities can override these rules by voting locally to waive the owner-occupancy and family requirements. The law directly affects homeowners in qualifying single-family neighborhoods seeking to add ADUs on smaller properties.
By Representative Turco of Winthrop, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2344) of Jeffrey Rosario Turco, David F. DeCoste and Colleen M. Garry for legislation to require safe harbor exceptions to the multi-family zoning as-of-right in certain MBTA communities. Municipalities and Regional Government.
By Mr. O'Connor, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1466) of Patrick M. O'Connor for legislation to restore local zoning control relative to multi-family zoning as-of-right in MBTA communities. Municipalities and Regional Government.
This bill establishes a 0.2-mile buffer zone around manufactured home communities in Massachusetts MBTA communities. It requires local zoning ordinances to prohibit new multi-family housing developments (like apartment buildings) within this buffer distance. The law directly affects manufactured home communities by limiting nearby development and impacts developers or communities planning new housing projects near these areas. The key mechanism is the mandatory zoning restriction to keep new multi-family housing separate from manufactured home communities.
HD 3650 allows Massachusetts municipalities to request exemptions from state housing mandates, such as those in Chapter 40A. A town or city can petition the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities if compliance would cause an undue financial burden, exceed local capacity for housing or infrastructure, or conflict with existing zoning. The bill requires petitioners to provide evidence supporting one of these three specific grounds. The Department of Housing and Community Development must create rules for reviewing these exemption requests, including timelines and approval criteria.
By Mr. O'Connor, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1018) of Patrick M. O'Connor for legislation to allow municipalities to preserve owner occupancy in accessory dwelling units. Housing.