This bill requires public colleges and universities to provide prospective and current students with specific financial and career data when applying for or changing a major. Institutions must share four key pieces of information: the estimated total cost of completing the major, average student debt for recent graduates, job placement outcomes (including unemployment rates and further education enrollment), and average 3-year graduate salaries. The data must be provided at the point of major selection or change, directly affecting students making educational decisions. This aims to improve transparency about the financial and career outcomes tied to different academic programs.
This bill requires the Massachusetts Department of Higher Education to create regulations guaranteeing college credit at all state colleges and universities for students who earn a score of 3 or higher on Advanced Placement (AP) exams. It directly affects high school students taking AP courses and state institutions of higher education. The key provision mandates that state schools must accept these AP scores for credit, establishing a standardized process through new department regulations. This policy change ensures consistent credit recognition for qualifying AP exam results across all public higher education institutions in Massachusetts.
Senate, June 23, 2025 -- The committee on Higher Education, to whom was referred the petitions (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 928) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to ban legacy preferences in higher education; (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 943) of Mark C. Montigny for legislation to ban discriminatory admissions practices at higher education institutions; and (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 950) of Pavel M. Payano for legislation to require higher education institutions to issue an annual report to the attorney general and department of higher education on their prior year admissions preference, report the accompanying bill (Senate, No. 2534).
By Representative Cataldo of Concord, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1425) of Simon Cataldo, Francisco E. Paulino and Mindy Domb relative to higher education admissions. Higher Education.
By Mr. Kennedy, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 937) of Edward J. Kennedy for legislation to invest in public higher education. Higher Education.
This bill (HD 1273) creates a tuition-free education program for current public school teachers and paraprofessionals working in Massachusetts. It requires the Board of Higher Education and the Board of Education to establish a program allowing these educators to take courses at Massachusetts public colleges and universities without paying tuition. The key mechanism is a mandatory state-level program, not individual applications, directly affecting eligible educators employed in the Commonwealth's public schools. The policy change eliminates tuition costs for participating educators seeking further education at public institutions.
This bill removes a restriction that previously limited tuition and fee waivers for adopted foster children to only "state-supported" colleges. It directly affects youth who were in foster care and adopted, expanding their access to higher education cost assistance. The key change modifies existing law by striking "state-supported" and inserting "full" after "provide," meaning waivers can now apply at any eligible institution, not just state-funded ones. This is a concrete policy adjustment to broaden educational opportunities for this specific group.
By Mr. Payano, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 439) of Pavel M. Payano for legislation to enhance the alignment and career focus of college and work-based learning. Education.
By Mr. Moore, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 2045) of Michael O. Moore for legislation to establish a college tuition tax deduction. Revenue.
H 4653 prevents public colleges and universities (defined in Chapter 15A) from being required to release student education records covered by FERPA, including records labeled as "directory information." The bill directly affects these institutions by exempting them from producing such records upon request, though it does not restrict government agencies (federal, state, or local) from accessing them under existing law. Key provisions clarify that institutions cannot be compelled to share these specific student records, reinforcing privacy protections. The bill focuses solely on record-sharing requirements, not broader education policy.