Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Courts)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Massachusetts, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
52
194th Legislature (2025-2026)
Top supporter
-
no data yet
Top opponent
-
no data yet
Ranked legislators
0
0 support · 0 oppose
Showing 21–30 of 52 bills

All criminal justice bills

passed · Massachusetts · Senate Feb 27, 2025

SD 2091: An Act relative to court officers injured on duty

By Mr. Feeney, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1849) of Paul R. Feeney for legislation relative to court officers injured on duty. Public Service.
Sub-Topics Courts
passed · Massachusetts · Senate Feb 27, 2025

SD 2540: An Act relating to threats of suicide while in court custody (Stavri’s Law)

By Mr. Oliveira, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1238) of Jacob R. Oliveira for legislation relative to threats of suicide while in court custody (Stavri’s Law). The Judiciary.
Sub-Topics Courts
passed · Massachusetts · Senate Feb 27, 2025

SD 1067: An Act addressing school exclusion policies to remedy disparities in students' educational achievement

By Ms. Jehlen, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 376) of Patricia D. Jehlen for legislation to promote the education success of court involved children. Education.
Sub-Topics Courts
passed · Massachusetts · Senate Feb 27, 2025

SD 2222: An Act to establish privileged contact with members of the general court

By Ms. Miranda, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1727) of Liz Miranda for legislation to protect the confidentiality of communications with members of the general court and inmates. Public Safety and Homeland Security.
Sub-Topics Courts
introduced · Massachusetts · House

HD 3636: An Act relative to controlling and abusive litigation

This bill creates a new legal framework to address abusive lawsuits between family or household members where one party has been found to have committed abuse. It defines "controlling and abusive litigation" as legal actions primarily intended to harass, intimidate, or maintain contact with a victim, often involving repetitive claims or lacking legal merit. Victims can request court orders restricting such litigation, which would require courts to verify abuse history and litigation patterns before imposing penalties. If found abusive, the case is dismissed with prejudice, and the perpetrator must pay all costs, attorney fees, and faces a 48-72 month ban on filing new lawsuits.
Sub-Topics Courts
introduced · Massachusetts · House

HD 3966: An Act relative to the exposure of public safety officials to HIV

This bill (HD 3966) allows certain public safety workers to seek court-ordered HIV testing of individuals who exposed them to blood or bodily fluids during their duties. It directly affects law enforcement officers, healthcare providers, firefighters, EMS personnel, and paramedics. The key provision lets these workers petition a court for an order compelling the testing of the person who caused the exposure; results are shared only with the affected worker and their medical provider. The bill does not change existing HIV testing rules but creates a specific legal process for these workers after exposure incidents.
Sub-Topics Courts Law Enforcement
introduced · Massachusetts · House

HD 3556: An Act prohibiting court ordered visitation rights to any persons convicted of criminal offenses against a minor

This bill prohibits courts from ordering unsupervised visitation between parents convicted of specific crimes against minors and their children. It directly affects parents convicted of offenses listed in Chapter 265 (e.g., sexual abuse, child endangerment) and Chapter 272 (e.g., child exploitation, trafficking) of the Massachusetts General Laws. The prohibition applies unless the child is of "suitable age" to consent and a court-appointed guardian ad litem determines the visitation is in the child’s best interest. The bill amends Sections 28 of Chapter 208 and Section 37 of Chapter 209 in the General Laws.
Sub-Topics Courts
introduced · Massachusetts · House

HD 2417: An Act relative to appealing a notice of disinvitation

This bill (HD 2417) creates a legal process for people who receive a written notice stating they are no longer welcome on property and would face criminal trespass if they enter. It allows them to file a complaint in district court to cancel the notice if the person who issued it abused their authority over the property. If the court agrees, it will cancel the notice, and the person can use this as a legal defense against any trespass charges. The bill directly affects property owners, tenants, or visitors who receive such disinvitation notices, providing a court-based remedy instead of automatic trespass penalties.
Sub-Topics Courts
introduced · Massachusetts · House

HD 3317: An Act relative to eliminating liability limits for abuse of a minor

HD 3317, titled "An Act relative to eliminating liability limits for abuse of a minor," amends Massachusetts law to remove financial damage caps in civil lawsuits involving sexual abuse of minors. The bill specifically targets claims defined under Section 4C of Chapter 260 (sexual abuse of a minor) by adding that such cases "shall not be subject to a limitation on damages." This change directly affects victims of minor sexual abuse and their legal representatives in civil court, ensuring they can seek full compensation without financial limits imposed by current law. The key mechanism is a targeted amendment to Section 85K of Chapter 231, overriding existing damage restrictions for these specific claims.
Sub-Topics Courts
introduced · Massachusetts · Senate

SD 358: An Act providing a defense to prosecution for violations of the wiretap law for interceptions made to make a record of threats, harassment or other crimes

This bill (SD 358) amends Massachusetts' wiretap law to create a legal defense for people who record communications to document threats, harassment, or other crimes in specific family law contexts. It directly affects individuals involved in divorce, child custody disputes, or cases involving protection orders (Chapter 209A or 258E) who record such communications. Key provisions allow recording for these purposes without prosecution, permit disclosure of the recordings, and place the burden of proof on the recorder to show the recording was exempt under the law. The bill applies only to recordings made to document threats/harassment related to family court matters or protection orders, not general communications.
Sub-Topics Courts
Showing 21 to 30 of 52 bills
Previous 1 2 3 4 6 Next