Issue · Technology

Technology

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in Iowa, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Jack Whitver
100% support rate
Top opponent
Art Staed
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving technology in Iowa

Legislators moving technology in Iowa
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Jack Whitver
Jack Whitver Senate · District 23
R
Strong +
100% 40
Mike Pike
Mike Pike Senate · District 20
R
Strong +
100% 40
Annette Sweeney
Annette Sweeney Senate · District 27
R
Strong +
100% 37
Ken Rozenboom
Ken Rozenboom Senate · District 19
R
Strong +
100% 39
Carrie Koelker
Carrie Koelker Senate · District 33
R
Strong +
100% 39
Art Staed
Art Staed Senate · District 40
D
Strong −
0% 40
Janet Petersen
Janet Petersen Senate · District 18
D
Strong −
0% 37
Tom Townsend
Tom Townsend Senate · District 36
D
Strong −
0% 41
Sarah Garriott
Sarah Garriott Senate · District 14
D
Strong −
0% 38
Herman Quirmbach
Herman Quirmbach Senate · District 25
D
Strong −
0% 40
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All technology bills

signed · Iowa · Senate May 6, 2026

SF 2296: A bill for an act relating to digital financial kiosks, modifying civil penalties, and including effective date and applicability provisions.

This bill regulates digital financial kiosks in Iowa that exchange digital assets (like cryptocurrencies) for cash or other assets. It requires kiosk operators to obtain a money transmission license, report all kiosk locations to the banking division, and comply with specific pricing rules. Violations could result in civil fines up to $10,000 per incident, enforced by the attorney general. The law takes effect immediately upon enactment and applies to all such kiosks operating in Iowa.
signed · Iowa · Senate May 2, 2026

SF 2417: A bill for an act establishing requirements and guidelines for conversational AI services, and providing civil penalties, and including applicability provisions.

Iowa's SF 2417 establishes rules for conversational AI services - like chatbots that simulate human interaction - to protect users, especially minors. It requires operators to clearly disclose when users interact with AI (not humans), prevent harmful content (such as sexually explicit material or false romantic interactions), and provide privacy tools for minors and their parents. The law also mandates suicide crisis response protocols and bans AI from misleadingly claiming to offer professional mental health services. Violations can result in civil penalties up to $500,000 per operator, enforced by the Attorney General, with the law taking effect July 1, 2027.
passed · Iowa · Senate Mar 26, 2026

SF 259: A bill for an act limiting the release of personal information for traffic violations observed by an out-of-state traffic camera, making penalties applicable, and including effective date provisions.

This bill prevents Iowa state agencies and law enforcement from sharing drivers' personal information (like license or registration details) when trying to collect fines for traffic violations recorded by cameras located outside Iowa. It specifically blocks the use of such data to issue or collect fines for out-of-state camera violations, such as speeding or running red lights captured by cameras in other states. Exceptions apply only if the request involves investigating criminal or civil violations unrelated to traffic law. The law takes effect January 1, 2026.
passed · Iowa · Senate Mar 31, 2025

SF 289: A bill for an act relating to invasion of privacy, and making penalties applicable.

SF 289 updates Iowa's invasion of privacy law to specifically address non-consensual recording. It makes it a violation to knowingly view, photograph, or film someone for sexual gratification, or to possess such material without a legitimate reason. The bill directly affects individuals who secretly record others in private settings for sexual purposes. Penalties apply when these actions occur, clarifying the legal consequences for violating privacy in this manner. This law strengthens protections against non-consensual intimate recordings by defining clear prohibited conduct.