Iowa's SF 2283 restricts law enforcement use of drones (unmanned aerial vehicles) for general traffic enforcement, prohibiting state or local police from using them except in specific situations. The bill allows certified officers to operate drones only to assist in apprehending drivers fleeing police during a pursuit under Iowa Code §321.279, and to cite traffic violations committed during that pursuit. Operators must hold FAA certification, register drones with the FAA, avoid controlled airspace, and follow aviation notices, with noncompliance making them liable for damages. Evidence collected by drones under this exception is admissible in criminal cases against fleeing drivers, but otherwise drone-collected information is inadmissible in court unless obtained with a search warrant.
This bill updates laws concerning services and support for youth under 21, especially those involved in involuntary commitment, juvenile delinquency, or child and family in need of assistance proceedings. It revises regulations for psychiatric medical institutions for children (PMICs), updating definitions and requiring them to provide comprehensive care that includes physical assessments and behavioral health evaluations. The bill also addresses the licensing and certification of other residential facilities, the provision of home and community-based services to youth, and the administration of juvenile court services. Finally, it modifies Hawki eligibility for inmates of public institutions.
House File 643 requires the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to reimburse counties for the costs of temporarily holding or confining sexually violent predators (SVPs). This applies when an SVP, already under a civil commitment order, commits a new public offense and is subsequently transferred to or sentenced to a county jail. HHS must pay the county $50 per day for the duration the SVP is held or confined in the county jail. The bill specifies that these reimbursements will be paid from funds appropriated for the treatment and commitment of sexually violent predators or from other designated transferred funds.
This bill establishes new requirements for county attorneys regarding the review of officer-involved shooting cases resulting in death or serious bodily injury. It mandates that county attorneys review evidence and then either issue a written opinion and charging decision, convene a grand jury, or refer the case to the attorney general. A written report detailing the review's results must be provided to the officer involved and their employing agency within 180 days of the county attorney receiving evidence. Furthermore, if a conflict of interest arises, the review must be referred to an independent prosecutor.
This bill revises regulations for city civil service employees, primarily impacting police and fire departments, and modifies city civil service commissions. It prohibits cities with civil service commissions from establishing citizen review boards for officer conduct and mandates that larger cities (over 50,000 residents) establish civil service commissions with five to seven members. The legislation also changes the standard for employee discipline, requiring "just cause" and proof by a "preponderance of the evidence" for violations of law, city policies, or department rules, with cities bearing the burden to show punishment is proportionate. Furthermore, it requires the disclosure of exculpatory evidence to employees facing charges and adjusts appeal hearing procedures.
This bill amends Iowa law concerning the sexual exploitation of a minor, specifically addressing the prosecution of offenses related to visual depictions of child sexual abuse. Currently, possessing multiple images of different minors is prosecuted as separate offenses, but possessing multiple images of the *same* minor is treated as a single offense. The bill changes this by stipulating that knowingly purchasing or possessing multiple visual depictions of the *same* minor engaged in prohibited sexual acts will now be prosecuted and punished as separate offenses for each distinct image. This means individuals could face separate felony charges for each distinct image of child sexual exploitation, even if all images depict the same minor.
SF 625 modifies Iowa's gambling tax revenue allocation. It directs $8 million annually from sports wagering receipts to the public safety equipment fund starting July 1, 2026, for enforcement activities like boat and racetrack inspections. The bill also establishes a gaming enforcement revolving fund to cover direct costs for criminal investigation agents, adjusts regulatory fees based on prior-year unspent funds, and creates an Iowa horse racing fund to distribute tax revenue from simulcast horse races to counties and the commission. These changes affect gambling licensees through fee adjustments and ensure specific tax revenues fund public safety and horse racing operations.
SF 289 updates Iowa's invasion of privacy law to specifically address non-consensual recording. It makes it a violation to knowingly view, photograph, or film someone for sexual gratification, or to possess such material without a legitimate reason. The bill directly affects individuals who secretly record others in private settings for sexual purposes. Penalties apply when these actions occur, clarifying the legal consequences for violating privacy in this manner. This law strengthens protections against non-consensual intimate recordings by defining clear prohibited conduct.
SF 571 requires criminal defendants to seek court approval before obtaining subpoenas for documents or evidence, rather than issuing them directly. To get approval, defendants must prove a compelling need for evidence that is exculpatory (could prove innocence), material, necessary, and admissible at trial, while avoiding private information of crime victims or others. The bill mandates that subpoenaed documents must be shared with prosecutors within five business days, prohibits using noncompliant evidence in court, and requires courts to appoint attorneys for indigent individuals served with subpoenas. It also establishes penalties for attorneys who violate these rules and bars postconviction claims based on improperly obtained subpoena evidence.
