Issue · Budget & Taxes

Budget & Taxes

Every budget & taxes bill, vote, and legislator stance in Illinois, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
104th Regular Session
Top supporter
Robert Peters
100% support rate
Top opponent
Chapin Rose
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving budget & taxes in Illinois

Legislators moving budget & taxes in Illinois
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Robert Peters
Robert Peters Senate · District 13
D
Strong +
100% 51
Sara Feigenholtz
Sara Feigenholtz Senate · District 6
D
Strong +
100% 48
Hoan Huynh
Hoan Huynh House · District 13
D
Strong +
100% 80
Ram Villivalam
Ram Villivalam Senate · District 8
D
Strong +
100% 56
Celina Villanueva
Celina Villanueva Senate · District 12
D
Strong +
100% 57
Chapin Rose
Chapin Rose Senate · District 51
R
Strong −
0% 61
Jil Tracy
Jil Tracy Senate · District 50
R
Strong −
0% 80
Andrew Chesney
Andrew Chesney Senate · District 45
R
Strong −
0% 49
Terri Bryant
Terri Bryant Senate · District 58
R
Strong −
0% 60
Chris Balkema
Chris Balkema Senate · District 53
R
Strong −
0% 55
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All budget & taxes bills

passed · Illinois · House May 7, 2026

HB 4921: MUNI CD-COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS

Amends the Illinois Municipal Code. Provides that the corporate authorities of a municipality may license and regulate all commercial operations within the municipality's boundaries, whether for profit or not for profit, but may not impose any tax upon their operations except as otherwise authorized by law. Limits the definition of "commercial operations" to exclude agritourism operations, agricultural properties, agribusinesses, agritourism activities, agricultural experiences, and pollution control facilities.
in committee · Illinois · House Apr 29, 2026

HB 4554: CONVERSION THERAPY-NO FUNDING

Amends the State Finance Act. Provides that the State shall not expend or invest any public funds in any organization, nonprofit organization, religious organization, or any other entity to be used for conversion therapy. Provides that the State shall not enter into any contract for the provision of conversion therapy. Provides that any contract entered into or renewed after the effective date of the amendatory Act that is used or will be used for conversion therapy shall be void and unenforceable as contrary to public policy. Defines "conversion therapy".
in committee · Illinois · House Apr 11, 2025

HB 2693: STATE AGENCY BONUS PROHIBITION

Creates the State Agency and Grantee Bonus Prohibition Act. Provides that no State agency or hospital shall pay from State funds, in whole or in part, and no employee of a State agency or hospital may receive a bonus as all or part of his or her compensation, including such bonuses as may be received for work on capital projects. Provides that no grantee shall pay, and no employee or contract worker of a grantee may receive, a bonus paid from grant funds awarded for operational expenses as all or part of his or her compensation, including such bonuses as may be received for work on capital projects. Provides that State agencies who use bonuses paid to State employees shall provide an annual report to the General Assembly itemizing each bonus awarded, including the amount of the bonuses awarded, the purpose of the bonus, the position of the employees to whom bonuses were awarded, and the overall agency fiscal impact for the bonuses awarded in the prior fiscal year. Effective immediately.
passed · Illinois · House Feb 5, 2025

HR 119: STOP-TARIFF PLANS

This Illinois House resolution (HR 119) calls on President Trump to abandon proposed tariffs, arguing they would increase costs for Illinois families and businesses. It specifically highlights risks to Illinois agriculture (like soybeans), manufacturing, and the state's top trade relationships with Canada and Mexico - impacting thousands of jobs. The resolution does not create new laws but formally opposes the tariff plans based on economic projections of higher living costs and market instability. It is a symbolic statement, not a binding policy change.