This bill confirms the Claims Commissioner's decision to dismiss a legal claim filed against the state by Earl Bradley. It does not create new laws or policies but serves as a procedural resolution to finalize an administrative ruling. The measure directly affects the state's legal exposure by officially closing the specific claim identified as file number 26343.
This bill confirms the Claims Commissioner's decision to dismiss a legal claim filed against the state by Byron Keith Bibbins. It does not create new laws or policies but serves as a procedural resolution to finalize an administrative ruling. The measure applies specifically to the state of West Virginia and the individual named in the dismissed claim. By ratifying the commissioner's action, the bill closes the legal matter without requiring further legislative intervention.
This bill confirms the Claims Commissioner's decision to deny a financial claim against the state made by Jose Vazquez. It directly affects the state of Maryland by upholding the ruling that Vazquez is not entitled to state funds. The resolution does not create new laws or change existing policies but rather ratifies an administrative determination already made by the Claims Commissioner.
This bill confirms the Claims Commissioner's decision to deny a claim filed by Frederick Basso against the state. It directly affects the state by upholding the ruling that Basso's claim will not be paid. The key provision is a formal resolution that validates the administrative decision to reject the financial request. No new laws or policies are created; this is a procedural measure to finalize the outcome of an existing claim.
This bill confirms the Claims Commissioner's decision to dismiss a legal claim filed against the state by William Ricks. It does not create new laws or policies but serves as a formal acknowledgment of an administrative ruling regarding a specific individual's lawsuit. The resolution affects only the state's legal record concerning this particular claim and does not establish broader procedures or impact the general public.
This bill confirms the Claims Commissioner's decision to dismiss a legal claim filed against three individuals: Joanne Avoletta, Matthew Avoletta, and Peter Avoletta. The resolution formally approves the dismissal of the case, which was previously handled under file number 27021 by the state's Claims Commissioner. This procedural measure does not create new laws or policies but rather ratifies an existing administrative ruling regarding a specific lawsuit against these three people.
This bill confirms the Claims Commissioner's decision to dismiss a legal claim filed against State Representative Perry Forgione. By passing this resolution, the House formally validates the administrative ruling that ended the specific lawsuit identified by file number 27092. The measure directly affects the state representative by upholding the dismissal of the claim against him. It does not create new laws or policies but serves to ratify an existing administrative action within the legislative process.
This bill confirms a decision by the Claims Commissioner to dismiss a legal claim filed against State Representative Jennifer Buonfiglio. It does not create new laws or policies but rather ratifies an existing administrative ruling to resolve a specific dispute. The measure affects only Buonfiglio and the state by formally closing the case, ensuring no further legal action can be pursued against her based on that claim.
This bill confirms the Claims Commissioner's decision to dismiss a financial claim filed against the state by William Ricks. It directly affects the state government and the individual claimant by formally upholding the ruling that the claim will not be paid. The key provision is a single resolution that validates the administrative decision to reject the lawsuit without requiring further legislative action. This procedural measure finalizes the outcome of a specific legal dispute rather than creating new policy or laws.
This bill confirms the Claims Commissioner's decision to dismiss a legal claim filed against the state by Marvin Minter. It does not create new laws or change existing policies but serves as a formal procedural step to uphold the administrative ruling. The measure directly affects Marvin Minter by finalizing the dismissal of his claim against the state government.
This bill confirms the Claims Commissioner's decision to dismiss a legal claim against the state regarding the estate of Patrick Camera, with Frank Camera serving as the administrator. By approving the dismissal, the resolution allows the state to avoid potential liability for this specific claim without requiring additional legislative action or funding. The measure is a procedural confirmation rather than a new law, directly affecting only the state's legal standing in this particular estate dispute.
This bill confirms the Claims Commissioner's decision to dismiss a legal claim against State of Columbia Dental P.C., Columbia Oral Maxillofacial Imaging, LLC, and Abbas Mohammadi. It does not create new laws or change policy but serves to formally acknowledge an existing administrative ruling. The resolution affects only the named entities involved in the dismissed claim and does not impact the general public or other state agencies.
