Home › Colorado › Bills
Bills

Colorado Bills

Track legislation and stay informed about the bills that matter to you.

Bill results

passed · Colorado · House Apr 20, 2023

HB 23-1206: County Sheriffs And District Attorneys

The bill requires a county sheriff in a county with a population of 25,000 or more to possess a bachelor's degree or higher in criminal justice or a related field. The bill requires candidates for the offices of county sheriff and district attorney to petition onto the ballot and prevents those candidates from being nominated as a candidate for a primary process election. Relatedly, the bill also prevents a ballot from listing the political affiliation of candidates for the offices of county sheriff and district attorney and excludes county sheriffs and district attorneys from party committees. Lastly, the The bill prohibits county sheriff's office employees from: participating in specified political activities. Soliciting money on behalf of a political campaign; Using their official position to make a public endorsement of a candidate for elected office, to reflect their personal political feelings as those of the county sheriff's department, or to exert pressure on anyone to influence that person's political views; Display political advertising or paraphernalia on the employee's body or automobile while on duty or in uniform; and Display political advertising on county land, buildings, or equipment. The bill includes a penalty for violating these provisions of up to one thousand dollars and potentially dismissal from the service of the county sheriff's office. (Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.) (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Nick Hinrichsen (D) Bob Marshall (D)
passed both · Colorado · House Apr 17, 2023

HCR 23-1002: Modification to Property Tax Exemption For Veterans With A Disability

The state constitution allows a veteran who has a service-connected disability rated as a 100% permanent disability to claim a property tax exemption for a portion of the actual value of the veteran's owner-occupied primary residence. The 100% permanent disability requirement can only be changed through a constitutional amendment. The concurrent resolution submits a constitutional amendment to the voters of the state at the 2024 general election that will, if approved, expand eligibility for the exemption by allowing a veteran who has individual unemployability status, as determined by the U.S. department of veterans affairs, to claim the exemption. In most cases, to have individual unemployability status, a veteran must be unable to keep a steady job because the veteran either has at least one service-connected disability rated at 60% or more disabling or has 2 or more service-connected disabilities with at least one disability rated at 40% or more disabling and a combined rating of 70% or more disabling. To conform to the existing public policy of the state that "people first language" be used in new or amended legislation that refers to persons with disabilities, the concurrent resolution also changes the existing defined term "disabled veteran" to "veteran with a disability". (Note: This summary applies to this concurrent resolution as adopted.)
Rhonda Fields (D) Bob Marshall (D) Perry Will (R)
passed · Colorado · House Mar 28, 2023

HB 23-1090: Limit Metropolitan District Director Conflicts

For any proposed metropolitan district that has any property within its boundaries that is zoned or valued for assessment as residential, section 1 of the bill prohibits requires the service plan to include a prohibition on the purchase of district debt by any entity with respect to which any director of the district has a conflict of interest necessitating disclosure under current law. Section 2 prohibits a board of county commissioners from approving a service plan for such a metropolitan district unless the service plan includes the prohibition. Section 3 prohibits a court from considering a petition for the organization for such a metropolitan district unless the service plan includes the prohibition. Section 2 4 prohibits a member of the board of a metropolitan district that approved the issuance of any debt while the member was serving on the board from acquiring any interest in the debt individually or on behalf of any organization or entity for which the board member is engaged as an employee, counsel, consultant, representative, or agent unless the debt is acquired indirectly through an investment fund and the member has no input into or control over the individual securities that the fund purchases. Section 3 5 states that proof of a violation of the prohibition set forth in section 2 4 is proof that the violator has breached the actor's fiduciary duty and the public trust. (Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.) (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Robert Rodriguez (D) Mike Weissman (D)
passed · Colorado · Senate Mar 21, 2023

SB 23-041: Prescription Drugs For Off-label Use

The bill authorizes a physician, a physician assistant, and an advanced practice registered nurse licensed health-care professional who is authorized to prescribe drugs (prescriber) to prescribe and administer a drug approved by the federal food and drug administration (FDA) for an off-label use. if: The off-label use of the drug for the indication has longstanding, common use; There is medical evidence to support the off-label use and no known evidence contraindicating such off-label use; and The prescriber has provided the patient or a minor patient's parent or guardian with an informed consent form, and the patient or parent or guardian has signed the form. The bill applies the same standard of care for the off-label use of the drug as for the on-label use of the drug. The bill clarifies that: The prescription and administration of an FDA-approved drug for an off-label use is not, by itself, a grounds for discipline; and A pharmacist who fills a prescription for off-label use is not subject to discipline by the state board of pharmacy. (Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.) (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Judy Amabile (D) Joann Ginal (D) Jim Smallwood (R)
Showing 325 to 336 of 1,072 bills
Previous 1 … 27 28 29 … 90 Next