SB 954 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Environmental Quality Act: advanced manufacturing facilities: exemption.

Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA defines various terms, including "natural and protected lands" for its purposes. This bill would revise the definition of that term to include habitats for protected species identified as candidate, sensitive, or species of special status by state or federal agencies. CEQA exempts from its requirement projects that consist exclusively of a day care center that is not located in a residential area and projects that consist exclusively of an advanced manufacturing facility located on a site zoned exclusively for industrial uses. This bill would additionally exempt projects consisting exclusively of a family day care home, as defined. The bill would, for the exemption for the day care center and family day care home, instead require the projects for those facilities not be located in an area zoned for industrial use or within 3,200 feet of a facility that actively extracts or refines oil or natural gas in order for the exemption to apply. The bill would revise the exemption for advanced manufacturing facility projects to require those projects to be used exclusively for final tier manufacturing, as defined. The bill would require an applicant of an advanced manufacturing project that is exempted from CEQA under the bill's requirement to enter into a bona fide community benefits agreement, as provided, and to comply with certain labor requirements, as provided. The bill would require the lead agency, before determining that an advanced manufacturing project is exempt from CEQA, to hold at least one public hearing on the project and to ensure that the applicant complies with the requirement to enter into a bona fide community benefits agreement and the labor requirements. CEQA exempts from its requirements a rezoning that implements the schedule of actions contained in an approved housing element. CEQA specifies that this exemption does not apply to a rezoning that would allow for the construction of certain facilities, including oil and gas infrastructure. CEQA also specifies that this exemption does not apply rezoning that would allow for construction to occur within the boundaries of any natural and protected lands, except as provided. This bill would repeal the exception from the CEQA exemption for rezoning that would allow for oil and gas infrastructure. The bill would specify that the definition of "natural and protected land" does not include habitats for protected species that would be added to that definition by this bill for purposes the exception for rezoning that would allow for construction to occur within the boundaries of any natural and protected lands to the CEQA exemption. CEQA specifies, for a proposed housing development project that would otherwise be exempt from its requirements but for a single condition required for the exemption to apply, that the application of CEQA is limited to the effects upon the environment that are caused by that single condition. CEQA provides that this limited application of CEQA does not apply if the proposed housing project is located on natural and protected land, but does not include "natural and protected land" that is a site within a very high fire hazard severity zone or within the state responsibility area, except as provided. This bill would additionally specify that "natural and protected land" does not include habitats for protected species that would be added to that definition by this bill. Because the bill would imposes additional duties on a lead agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status passed both 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 2, 2026 Last action Aug 28, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons

What changed between versions

08/21/26 - Amended Assembly SB954 · 3 edits
MINOR
The final enrolled version of SB 954 removed the requirement for the Governor to personally certify advanced manufacturing facility projects as a condition for the CEQA exemption. The old version required both Governor certification and meeting highly specific technical criteria (exact emissions thresholds, LEED gold certification, 50 percent zero-emission backup generation, and PFAS treatment systems for semiconductor facilities). The enrolled version simplifies the exemption to require that projects be used exclusively for final tier manufacturing, without the Governor approval step or the detailed technical specifications previously listed in the digest.
REQUIREMENT

The requirement that the Governor certify an advanced manufacturing facility project before it could qualify for the CEQA exemption was removed. Previously, the bill required both Governor certification and meeting specific criteria; now the exemption appears to apply based on meeting the stated conditions without a separate executive approval step.

The detailed technical criteria from the old version - including specific numerical emissions limits (54 lbs/day or 10 tons/year for ROG and NOx, 80 lbs/day or 14.6 tons for PM10, etc.), LEED gold or Green Globes gold certification, 50 percent zero-emission backup generation, and mandatory PFAS treatment systems for semiconductor facilities - are no longer reflected in the enrolled version's digest, indicating they were removed or substantially simplified.

SCOPE

The scope of the CEQA exemption for advanced manufacturing facilities was broadened by removing the Governor certification gate, meaning more projects could potentially qualify without executive branch involvement. The core requirement that facilities be used exclusively for final tier manufacturing remains.

Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2026 · Assembly Aug 26, 2026

How they voted

239
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 40
May 27, 2026
D Democratic30
23 Yea 1 Nay 6
76% Yea
R Republican10
8 Nay 2
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
35
Key actions
15
Committee
6
Amendments
10
Aug 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 28. Noes 10.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 27, 2026
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (August 13).
lower
Jun 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Jun 8, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and L. & E.
lower
May 27, 2026
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-9-8)
senate
May 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 10. Page 4447.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4259.) (May 14).
upper
Apr 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 4012.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
Apr 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L., P.E. & R. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3899.) (April 15).
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on E.Q. and L., P.E. & R.
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 11, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 2, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 16 co-sponsors

Sponsors