SB 895 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Science and Health Research Bond Act.

Summary
(1) Existing law establishes various grant and loan programs for research, including, among others, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, California Firefighter Cancer Prevention and Research Program, and the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Program. This bill would establish the California Foundation for Science and Health Research within the Government Operations Agency. The bill would require the Secretary of Government Operations to oversee the process of appointing the director of the foundation, and would authorize the Secretary of Government Operations to delegate the task of hiring and determining the salaries, bonuses, and benefits of additional personnel to the director, as specified. The bill would require the director and personnel of the foundation to be responsible for implementing the strategic objectives of the California Foundation for Science and Health Research Council, as described below, administering grants, loans, and contracts awarded by the council, and all other duties as deemed necessary for the operation of the foundation. This bill would create the California Foundation for Science and Health Research and Innovation Acceleration Fund and require the moneys in the fund to be used by the foundation to award grants and make loans to, and enter into contracts with, public or private research companies, universities, academic medical centers, institutes, and organizations for scientific research and development and for certain economic sectors, as specified, in specific areas of research, including, but not limited to, biomedical, behavioral health, and climate research. The bill would also create the California Foundation for Science and Health Research and Innovation Acceleration Benefit Fund, to consist solely of private donations. The bill would make the moneys in the benefit fund available for the same purposes as the California Foundation for Science and Health Research and Innovation Acceleration Fund. This bill would require that, prior to the first grant from the foundation and no later than one year from the date the bill takes effect, the council develop various provisions and requirements to facilitate the foundation's goals of affordability and equitable access. The foundation shall impose various requirements on the grantees, loan recipients, and contractors, as specified, including, among other things, developing strategies to promote equitable access to the subject invention in various specified communities and making the data resulting from the bond-funded research available to the broader scientific community, except in cases involving national security interests. The council shall also establish standards requiring that all grants, awards, and contracts be subject to intellectual property agreements that balance the opportunity for the State of California to benefit from the inventions, technologies, patents, royalties, and licenses that result from research funded by certain public and private grants, as specified. This bill would create the California Foundation for Science and Health Research Council, as specified, which shall be vested with full power, authority, and jurisdiction over the foundation. The bill would require the council to, among other things, develop the strategic objectives and priorities of the foundation and provide the opportunity for public comment on the foundation's priorities, as specified, determine the research projects that will be funded by the California Foundation for Science and Health Research and Innovation Acceleration Fund, develop objectives and opportunities that offer support to early career researchers, and adopt certain regulations and standards, as specified. The bill would also require the council to consider how the foundation's research priorities relate to or support various economic and industry considerations, as specified. The bill would provide that a majority of the members of the council constitutes a quorum for the transaction of any business, for the performance of any duty, or for the exercise of any power of the council, except as otherwise provided. The bill would authorize the council to establish one or more scientific peer review panels consisting of experts in specified fields of research for the purposes of reviewing and prioritizing proposals on the basis of the scientific merit of the proposal, the potential benefit to the health and well-being of the population, natural resources, and environment of the state, and the demonstrated background, training, and expertise of the researchers and investigators to conduct the proposed work. This bill would require all research and development funded by the California Foundation for Science and Health Research and Innovation Acceleration Fund to be conducted under established standards of open scientific exchange, peer review, and public oversight. The bill would require the funds and contracts to be awarded on the basis of the research priorities established for the foundation by the council and the scientific merit of the proposed research, as determined by an open, competitive, scientific peer review process that ensures objectivity, consistency, and high quality. This bill would enact the California Science and Health Research Bond Act, which, if approved by the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $7,500,000,000, pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law, to finance grants and loans to fund research and operate and maintain facilities for research. The bill would provide for the submission of the bond act to the voters at the March 7, 2028, statewide primary election. (2) Existing law establishes prohibitions and penalties with respect to ethical obligations and conflicts of interest for public officials, including a prohibition on engaging in activities that are incompatible with their official duties and a prohibition on being financially interested in a contract made by them in their official capacity or the board of which they are a part. This bill would authorize a council member to participate in a decision to approve or award a grant, loan, or contract for the purpose of research into a disease in which the member or their immediate family member has a personal interest, as specified. The bill would provide that service with specified educational institutions and organizations is not incompatible with a council member's duties. The bill would provide that the prohibition on being financially interested in a contract, as specified, does not apply if the council member recuses themself from a decision to award or approve a grant, loan, or contract that would otherwise be subject to the prohibition. The bill would provide that council members are subject to certain disclosure requirements relating to personal investments and potential conflicts of interest, as specified. (3) Existing law, the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, requires that all meetings of a state body be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend any meeting of a state body, with specified exceptions for authorized closed sessions. This bill would require the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act to apply to all meetings of the council and scientific peer review panels, except as specified for when the council or scientific peer review panels meet to consider or discuss specified matters in closed sessions, including matters involving information relating to patients or medical or scientific research subjects, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 15, 2026 Last action Aug 27, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons

What changed between versions

08/27/26 - Amended Assembly SB895 · 14 edits
MAJOR
The final version of SB 895 increases the bond authorization from $5 billion to $7.5 billion, shifts appointment authority for the foundation director and council members from the Secretary of Government Operations to the Governor, specifies the election date as the March 7, 2028 primary, and adds several new funding allocation requirements including a Cal-ARPA program, commercialization fund, and dedicated UC/CSU facility construction money. It also adds restrictions on foreign entities of concern, a California supplier preference, and a 75 percent in-state spending requirement for collaborative research.
FISCAL

Bond authorization increased from $5 billion to $7.5 billion.

Added requirement that at least $250 million be used for commercialization of research, capped at no more than 0.5 percent of total bond funds per year, with priority for entities demonstrating California job growth or manufacturing opportunities.

Added $1 billion allocation for UC and CSU construction and modernization of research facilities, split as $250 million for UC and $750 million for CSU.

Added cap limiting administrative costs to no more than 3 percent of fund moneys.

TIMELINE

Election date changed from 'next statewide general election' to the specific date of March 7, 2028 statewide primary election.

REQUIREMENT

Authority to appoint the foundation director shifted from the Secretary of Government Operations to the Governor. The Governor also sets the director's salary, capped at the UC Provost's base salary.

Added requirement that at least 10 percent of fund moneys be allocated to a Cal-ARPA program modeled on DARPA/ARPA-E/ARPA-H, capped at no more than 1.5 percent of total bond funds per year.

Added California supplier preference requiring that goods and services purchased with foundation funds come from California suppliers to the extent reasonably possible, with a goal of more than 50 percent.

Added provision that funds allocated to DOE or NASA laboratories must comply with the Federal Laboratory Contracting Act, and only national laboratories operating within California may be eligible.

Added requirement that all research projects involving human subjects must be reviewed and approved by an institutional review board meeting applicable legal requirements.

SCOPE

Council composition changed from 11-13 members with 7 appointed by the Secretary of Government Operations to a fixed structure with 9 members appointed by the Governor. Specific background requirements (economics, patient advocate, research policy) were replaced with broader criteria including scientific expertise, health advocacy, economic expertise, or demonstrated leadership.

Foundation's role expanded to include support for sectors identified as 'Bet' and 'Accelerate' sectors in the California Jobs First State Economic Blueprint, broadening the economic development focus beyond pure research fields.

ELIGIBILITY

Added prohibition on awarding funds to any entity constituting a 'foreign entity of concern' as defined in Section 4651(8) of Title 15 of the United States Code.

Out-of-state research collaboratives now require that 75 percent of project funds be utilized for research activities in California, rather than simply being permitted.

Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2026

How they voted

299
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
May 27, 2026
D Democratic30
29 Yea 1
96% Yea
R Republican10
9 Nay 1
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
28
Key actions
11
Committee
4
Amendments
8
Aug 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (August 13).
lower
Jun 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
May 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 9. Page 4496.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4256.) (May 14).
upper
Apr 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3869.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 6, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Mar 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on N.R. & W. (Ayes 9. Noes 2. Page 3689.) (March 25).
upper
Mar 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Feb 11, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and N.R. & W.
upper
Jan 15, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 50 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Scott Wiener
Scott Wiener
DDemocratic
CA
11
Co
Photo of Aisha Wahab
Aisha Wahab
DDemocratic
CA
10
Co
Photo of Akilah Weber Pierson
Akilah Weber Pierson
DDemocratic
CA
39
Co
Photo of Al Muratsuchi
Al Muratsuchi
DDemocratic
CA
66
Co
Photo of Anna Caballero
Anna Caballero
DDemocratic
CA
14
Co
Photo of Ben Allen
Ben Allen
DDemocratic
CA
24
Co
Photo of Blanca Rubio
Blanca Rubio
DDemocratic
CA
48
Co
Photo of Catherine Blakespear
Catherine Blakespear
DDemocratic
CA
38
Co
Photo of Catherine Stefani
Catherine Stefani
DDemocratic
CA
19
Co
Photo of Cecilia Aguiar-Curry
Cecilia Aguiar-Curry
DDemocratic
CA
4
Co
Photo of Celeste Rodriguez
Celeste Rodriguez
DDemocratic
CA
43