Disability access: construction-related accessibility claims: notice of violation and opportunity to correct.
Summary
Existing law prohibits discrimination on the basis of various specified personal characteristics, including disability. Existing law imposes minimum statutory damages for construction-related accessibility claims if the violation of a construction-related accessibility standard denied the plaintiff full and equal access to the place of public accommodation on a particular occasion, as specified. Existing law imposes various limits on a defendant's liability for statutory damages under specified sets of conditions, including if the defendant, among other things, corrects the construction-related violations within a specified time. This bill would prohibit a construction-related accessibility claim for statutory damages from being initiated in a legal proceeding against a defendant who employs 50 or fewer individuals, as specified, unless the defendant has been served with a letter specifying each alleged violation, and the alleged violations have not been corrected within 120 days of service of the letter. The bill would provide that a defendant is not liable for statutory damages, plaintiff's attorney's fees, or costs for an alleged violation that is corrected within 120 days of service of a letter alleging the violation. The bill would also prohibit a plaintiff from avoiding the notice and opportunity to correct provisions and the liability limitations by claiming they are seeking general discrimination damages based on a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 if the underlying claim is based on a defendant's failure to comply with physical accessibility standards under California law.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Jun 2025
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 17, 2025
Last action Jun 18, 2025
Floor votes · Senate Jun 4, 2025
How they voted
34–2
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
Jun 4, 2025
D
Democratic30
80% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
6
Committee
3
Amendments
4
Jun 18, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 16, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
lower
Jun 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 2. Page 1498.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1191.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 833.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 2, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 29, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
upper
Jan 17, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 24 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Roger Niello
RRepublican
Co
Aisha Wahab
DDemocratic
Co
Angelique Ashby
DDemocratic
Co
Anna Caballero
DDemocratic
Co
Ben Allen
DDemocratic
Co
Blanca Pacheco
DDemocratic
Co
Bob Archuleta
DDemocratic
Co
Catherine Blakespear
DDemocratic
Co
Christopher Cabaldon
DDemocratic
Co
Henry Stern
DDemocratic
Co
Jacqui Irwin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 84
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 84. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline