Criminal procedure: arraignment.
Summary
Existing law requires a person arrested without a warrant to be taken before the nearest magistrate in the county in which the offense is triable without delay. Existing law also authorizes a peace officer to release the arrested person from custody instead of taking them before a magistrate under certain specified circumstances, including if the person was arrested for intoxication only. Existing law requires the court, during the in-custody appearance of a person charged with a misdemeanor, to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that a public offense has been committed. This bill would require the court to promptly, but no later than 48 hours after a warrantless arrest, review the basis for the arrest and make an initial determination whether probable cause exists that an offense has been committed and that the arrested person committed it if the defendant remains in custody, as specified. The bill would require that if the court makes an initial finding of no probable cause, the court to order the person to be released immediately and provide notice to both the arrested person and the person having custody of the arrested person. Existing law similarly requires a juvenile that has been arrested to be released with 48 hours, excluding judicial holidays, unless a petition has been filed to make the minor a ward of the court or charges have been filed charging the minor as an adult. This bill would require the court to promptly, but no later than 48 hours after a juvenile is taken into custody, make a determination whether an offense has been committed and whether the juvenile in custody committed it, as specified. The bill would require that if the court makes an initial finding of no probable cause, the court to order the juvenile to be released immediately and provide notice to the juvenile, the person or entity having custody of the juvenile, and the public defender or indigent defense provider.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
04/02/25 - Amended Senate
→
SB821
·
1 edit
MINOR
This diff reflects a change in document presentation format only, from a traditional legislative document layout (with line numbers, page headers, and formal spacing) to a web-based bill text format (with navigation elements like 'skip to content,' 'home,' 'accessibility,' and search tools). The substantive bill text of SB 821 is identical between the two versions.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a traditional legislative print layout with line numbers and page breaks into a web-based presentation format with navigation menus, quick search, and standard website elements. No policy language was added, removed, or altered.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
3
Committee
3
Amendments
1
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 8, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 709.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 2, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 12, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JA
Jesse Arreguín
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 821
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 821. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline