Geothermal waste: exemption from generation and handling fees: study.
Summary
The hazardous waste control laws require the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to regulate the handling and management of hazardous waste and hazardous materials. A violation of the hazardous waste control laws is a crime. Existing law requires a generator of hazardous waste to pay to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration a generation and handling fee for each generator site that generates a specified amount of waste, as provided, and authorizes DTSC to adopt regulations necessary to implement generator fees. Existing law exempts geothermal waste resulting from drilling for geothermal resources from the hazardous waste control laws for a specified reason. Existing law also exempts geothermal waste, excluding filter cake, that is generated from the exploration, development, or production of geothermal energy and that does not result from drilling for geothermal resources, from the hazardous waste control laws under specified circumstances. This bill would require the DTSC to prepare and submit to the Legislature, no later than July 1, 2026, a study regarding the issues that would arise if geothermal waste that is not exempt from generation and handling fees pursuant to existing law is made exempt from those fees.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
03/26/25 - Amended Senate
→
SB819
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The diff reflects a change in document presentation format: the 'from' version is a formatted legislative document with line numbers, while the 'to' version is a web page rendering of the same bill text with navigation elements and search functionality added. The actual statutory language of Section 25138 (requiring DTSC to study geothermal waste fee exemptions by July 1, 2026) and Section 21000 (nonsubstantive CEQA findings amendments) is identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a numbered legislative document layout to a web page presentation. Line numbers were removed, website navigation elements (search, links, subscriptions) were added, and the header was changed from 'AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 26, 2025' to a title line. No changes to the actual statutory language.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Amendments
1
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 867.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 2, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Mar 26, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 12, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Padilla
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 819
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 819. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline