Emergency backup generators: critical facilities: exemptions.
Summary
Existing law imposes various limitations on emissions of air contaminants for the control of air pollution from vehicular and nonvehicular sources. Existing law generally designates air pollution control and air quality management districts with the primary responsibility for the control of air pollution from all sources other than vehicular sources. Existing law requires the State Air Resources Board to identify toxic air contaminants that are emitted into the ambient air of the state and to establish airborne toxic control measures to reduce emissions of toxic air contaminants from nonvehicular sources. This bill would require an air district without a specified rule on emergency backup generators, as defined, as of January 1, 2026, that adopts such a rule to include in the rule provisions that allow the operator of a critical facility, as defined, to use a permitted emergency backup generator in exceedance of the applicable runtime and testing and maintenance limits if specified conditions are met. The bill would require a critical facility allowed to exceed applicable limits under a rule adopted pursuant to that provision to attest to and provide evidence of having taken demonstrable steps toward implementing the use of backup power technologies that meet or exceed emission standards set by the state board. By adding to the duties of air districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/21/25 - Introduced
→
SB732
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions of SB 732. The differences are entirely presentational: the first version reflects a traditional printed bill format with line numbers and page headers, while the second version is the same text rendered on the California Legislative Information website with navigation elements, search tools, and web formatting added.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a printed document layout (with line numbers, page breaks, and header/footer artifacts) to a web-based legislative information site layout. No changes were made to the actual statutory language, definitions, requirements, or findings.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
7
Key actions
0
Committee
1
Mar 12, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 732
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 732. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline