SB 701 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Signal jammers.

Summary
Federal law prohibits a person from willfully or maliciously interfering with or causing interference to radio communications. Federal law prohibits a person from manufacturing, importing, selling, offering for sale, or shipping a device that interferes with radio communications. Federal law makes a violation of these prohibitions punishable by a fine of not more than $10,000 or by imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, or both the fine and imprisonment. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for a person to intercept a public safety radio service communication for the purpose of using the communication to assist in the commission of a criminal offense or to avoid arrest, as specified. Existing law makes it an infraction to possess or equip a vehicle with a device that is capable of interfering with a device used by a law enforcement agency to measure the speed of moving objects, as specified, and makes it a misdemeanor to possess four or more of those devices. This bill would make it a crime to manufacture, import, market, purchase, sell, or operate a signal jammer, as defined, unless authorized to do so by the Federal Communications Commission, punishable as an infraction for a first offense, and a misdemeanor for a 2nd offense, as specified. The bill would make it a misdemeanor to operate a signal jammer in conjunction with the commission of a misdemeanor or felony, punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 or by imprisonment. The bill would make it a crime to willfully or maliciously use a signal jammer to block state or local public safety communications, if the person knows or should know that using the signal jammer is likely to result in death or great bodily injury and great bodily injury or death is sustained by any person as a result of that use, punishable as either a misdemeanor or a felony. The bill would require forfeiture of the signal jamming device upon conviction for these crimes. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Senate Passage
Jun 2025
Assembly Passage
Sep 2025
Signed into Law
Oct 2025
Introduced Feb 21, 2025 Signed Oct 7, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons

What changed between versions

03/24/25 - Amended Senate 04/09/25 - Amended Senate · 3 edits · Apr 9, 2025
MINOR
SB 701 was amended to restructure the penalty tiers for signal jammer offenses. The basic offense (subsection a) changed from a single infraction with a $5,000 fine to a dual-tier structure offering either an infraction ($500 fine) or a misdemeanor (up to 1 year jail). The offense of using a jammer in conjunction with a crime (subsection b) was clarified as specifically a misdemeanor with the fine reduced from $5,000 to $1,000. The most serious offense of blocking public safety communications (subsection c) now allows prosecution as either a misdemeanor or a felony, adding a lower-penalty option.
REQUIREMENT

Subsection (a): The basic signal jammer offense changed from a single infraction punishable by forfeiture and a fine up to $5,000 to a dual-tier offense: either an infraction (forfeiture plus fine up to $500) or a misdemeanor (forfeiture plus up to 1 year in county jail, fine up to $500, or both).

Subsection (b): The offense of possessing or operating a signal jammer in conjunction with a crime was clarified as specifically a misdemeanor (previously just 'a crime'), and the maximum fine was reduced from $5,000 to $1,000.

Subsection (c): The offense of willfully or maliciously using a signal jammer to block public safety communications now allows prosecution as either a misdemeanor (county jail up to 1 year) or a felony (state prison for 2, 4, or 6 years), adding a lower-penalty option that did not previously exist.

Floor votes · Senate Jun 4, 2025 · Assembly Sep 8, 2025

How they voted

380
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Jun 4, 2025
D Democratic30
28 Yea 2
93% Yea
R Republican10
10 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
27
Key actions
11
Committee
4
Amendments
7
Oct 7, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2719.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 8, 2025
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2996.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 29, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 29).
lower
Jul 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 1).
lower
Jun 16, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1511.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1210.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 8, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 709.) (April 8).
upper
Mar 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 12, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors