SB 689 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Local jurisdictions: district-based elections.

Summary
The California Voting Rights Act of 2001 (CVRA) prohibits a political subdivision from imposing or applying an at-large method of election for members of the political subdivision's governing body in a manner that impairs the ability of a protected class to elect candidates of its choice or its ability to influence the outcome of an election, as specified. Existing law requires courts to implement appropriate remedies, including the imposition of district-based elections, for violations of the CVRA. Existing law defines "at-large method of election" for these purposes to include a method of election that combines at-large elections with district-based elections. This bill would create an exception for cities with a population of 50,000 people or less, whereby a method of electing members to the governing body of the city in which no more than 20% of the members are elected at large and the remaining members are elected by district would constitute a district-based election for purposes of the CVRA, unless that method of election would prevent the city from drawing district boundaries in a manner that allows a protected class to elect candidates of its choice. Existing law requires a prospective plaintiff, before commencing an action to enforce the CVRA, to first mail a written notice to the clerk of the political subdivision. Existing law prohibits the prospective plaintiff from commencing an action to enforce the CVRA within 45 days of the political subdivision's receipt of the notice and authorizes the political subdivision, within those 45 days, to pass a resolution outlining its intention to transition from at-large elections to district-based elections. This bill would extend that period to within 90 days of the political subdivision's receipt of the notice. Existing law requires a local jurisdiction that is governed by a legislative body elected using district-based elections to adopt boundaries for the election districts no later than 204 days before the local jurisdiction's next regular election occurring after January 1 in each year ending in the number 2. Existing law requires the local jurisdiction to hold workshops and public hearings before adopting new election district boundaries, as specified. This bill would require the local jurisdiction to make the population and demographic data that will be used to adopt its election district boundaries publicly available on its internet website no later than 9 months before the local jurisdiction's first regular election occurring after January 1 in each year ending in the number 2. To the extent the bill would create additional duties for local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025 Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

03/25/25 - Amended Senate 04/21/25 - Amended Senate · 11 edits · Apr 21, 2025
MAJOR
SB 689 was significantly restructured in this amendment. The bill removed its provision amending Section 19103 (voting system certification) and added a new, substantial section (Section 21160) imposing detailed redistricting transparency and public participation requirements on local jurisdictions. It also added an exception to the safe harbor that allows small cities (population 50,000 or less) to elect up to 20 percent of their governing body at large, permitting a plaintiff to override that safe harbor if it prevents a protected class from electing candidates of its choice.
SCOPE

The amendment to Elections Code Section 19103 (regarding the Secretary of State's voting system certification duties and legislative committee coordination) was entirely removed from the bill.

The new Section 21160 does not apply when a legislative body transitions from at-large to district elections or vice versa, and subdivisions (b) through (g), certain parts of (h), and most of (i) are exempted for special districts and small education districts.

REQUIREMENT

A new Section 21160 requires local jurisdictions to adopt a redistricting public education and outreach plan at least 4 weeks before the first workshop or hearing, post it online for 14-day review, and include specific elements such as methods of outreach, coordination with other jurisdictions, and number of planned hearings.

Local jurisdictions must make population and demographic data used for district boundary adoption publicly available on their website no later than 9 months before the first regular election in even-numbered years.

Local jurisdictions must arrange live translation of redistricting workshops or hearings upon request made at least 72 hours in advance (48 hours if less than 5 days' notice was given for the event).

Draft maps must be published online for at least 7 days before adoption (or 72 hours if fewer than 28 days remain until the boundary deadline), and each draft map must include total population, citizen voting age population, and racial/ethnic characteristics of the citizen voting age population.

Draft maps cannot be released earlier than 3 weeks after the block-level redistricting database is first made publicly available, with reduced or eliminated waiting periods if less than 90 days remain until the map adoption deadline.

Local jurisdictions must video or audio record (or prepare written summaries of) all public comment and deliberations at workshops and hearings, making them available on their redistricting web page within 14 days.

Local jurisdictions must establish a dedicated redistricting web page before the first workshop or hearing, maintained for at least 10 years after boundary adoption, containing process explanations, hearing calendars, translation notices, sign-up instructions, recordings, draft maps, public comments, and final adopted maps.

ELIGIBILITY

A new exception was added to Section 14026(b)(2): the safe harbor allowing cities of 50,000 or fewer to elect up to 20 percent of their governing body at large does not apply if a plaintiff can establish that having 20 percent elected at large would prevent the city from drawing district boundaries in a manner that allows a protected class to elect candidates of its choice.

FISCAL

A new Section 4 provides that if the Commission on State Mandates determines the bill contains state-mandated costs, reimbursement shall be made to local agencies and school districts under Government Code Part 7. The fiscal committee vote changed from 'no' to 'yes' and state-mandated local program changed from 'no' to 'yes.'

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
11
Key actions
2
Committee
2
Amendments
2
Apr 21, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Apr 2, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on E. & C.A. and L. GOV.
upper
Mar 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 5, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Josh Becker
Josh Becker
DDemocratic
CA
13