California Environmental Quality Act: judicial streamlining: state of emergency: wildfire.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would require, on and after January 1, 2027, for a project, located in a geographic area for which the Governor declared a state of emergency on or after January 1, 2023, that is to maintain, repair, restore, demolish, or replace property or facilities damaged or destroyed by wildfire, and the project is not otherwise exempt from CEQA, as specified, the lead agency to prepare the record of proceeding concurrently with the administrative process. The bill would also require an action or proceeding brought to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the certification of an environmental impact report, or the adoption of a negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration, for the project to be resolved, to the extent feasible, within 270 calendar days of the filing of the certified record of proceedings. The bill would require an applicant to agree to pay the costs of the trial court and court of appeal in hearing and deciding any action or proceeding brought under these provisions, as provided. The bill would require the Judicial Council to adopt rules of court to implement these requirements. The bill would require the project to be consistent with the applicable zoning and land use ordinances. By requiring a lead agency to prepare the record of proceedings concurrently with the administrative process, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Jul 2025
Senate Passage
Jun 2025
Assembly Passage
Sep 2025
Signed into Law
Oct 2025
Introduced Feb 21, 2025
Signed Oct 10, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons
What changed between versions
09/12/25 - Enrolled
→
10/10/25 - Chaptered
·
2 edits
·
Oct 10, 2025
MINOR
This diff reflects the standard transition of SB 676 from its enrolled version to its chaptered (signed into law) version. The only changes are formatting updates: the header was replaced with the official chaptered bill format, the bill was assigned Chapter 550, and the Governor's approval date of October 10, 2025 was added. A minor typographical correction was made to 'Article XIIIB' becoming 'Article XIII B.' No substantive policy language was altered.
TECHNICAL
Bill header changed from Senate/Assembly passage format to the official California chaptered bill format, adding Chapter 550 and the Governor's approval date of October 10, 2025.
Minor typographical correction in Section 2: 'Article XIIIB' was corrected to 'Article XIII B' (spacing fix in the Roman numeral reference).
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2025 · Assembly Sep 8, 2025
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Jun 3, 2025
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
13
Committee
7
Amendments
7
Oct 10, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2717.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 8, 2025
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3008.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 29, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 29).
lower
Jul 16, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jul 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (July 7).
lower
Jun 9, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and JUD.
lower
Jun 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1453.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1209.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 836.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 9, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 635.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Mar 5, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 16 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Monique Limón
DDemocratic
Co
Ali Macedo
RRepublican
Co
Anna Caballero
DDemocratic
Co
Blanca Pacheco
DDemocratic
Co
Bob Archuleta
DDemocratic
Co
Catherine Blakespear
DDemocratic
Co
Dave Cortese
DDemocratic
Co
Eloise Reyes
DDemocratic
Co
Henry Stern
DDemocratic
Co
Isaac Bryan
DDemocratic
Co
Kate Sanchez
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 676
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 676. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline