SB 659 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

The Parent's Accountability and Child Protection Act: remedies.

Summary
Existing law, the Parent's Accountability and Child Protection Act, requires a person or business that seeks to sell a specified product or service that is illegal under state law to sell to a minor to take reasonable steps to ensure that the purchaser is of legal age at the time of purchase or delivery, as prescribed. The act, in an action brought by a public prosecutor, subjects a business or person that violates the act to at least a $7,500 civil penalty for each violation. Existing law requires that the amount in controversy not exceed $35,000 for a limited civil case. This bill, in addition to any other remedy available under law, in an action brought by a public prosecutor or a parent or legal guardian of a minor who has acquired the product or service, would subject an online business, as defined, that violates the above-described provisions to a civil penalty of the maximum amount in controversy for a limited civil case, or 10 or 20 times that amount, as specified, for each violation and each minor user of the product or service.
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2025 Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/20/25 - Introduced 04/10/25 - Amended Senate · 5 edits · Apr 10, 2025
MODERATE
The Senate amendment restructures the civil penalty scheme into two tiers: a flat $7,500 per violation for any business or person (enforceable by a public prosecutor), and enhanced tiered penalties (1x, 10x, or 20x the limited civil case maximum) that now specifically target 'online businesses' with gross revenue of $100 million or more. A new definition of 'online business' is added, along with a definition of 'social media platform.' The amendment also narrows private standing by requiring that the minor actually acquired the product or service.
Scope change
The enhanced tiered penalties now apply only to 'online businesses' (those with $100M+ gross revenue selling covered products online), rather than all businesses and persons. Smaller or offline businesses face only the flat $7,500 penalty in prosecutor-brought actions. This significantly narrows the scope of the most severe enforcement mechanism.
DEFINITION

New definition of 'online business': a business selling covered products or services on a public-facing internet website, web application, or digital application (including mobile apps, social media platforms, advertising networks, mobile operating systems, search engines, email services, or internet access services). Businesses with less than $100 million in gross revenue during the preceding calendar year are excluded.

New definition of 'social media platform' by reference to Section 22675 of the Business and Professions Code.

ENFORCEMENT

The civil penalty structure is split into two parts: (d)(1) imposes a flat $7,500 per violation on any business or person in an action by a public prosecutor; (d)(2) imposes the enhanced tiered penalties (negligent = limited civil case max, knowing/willful = 10x, intentional = 20x) specifically on 'an online business or person' in actions by a public prosecutor or a parent/guardian of a minor who acquired the product or service.

ELIGIBILITY

Private right of action for enhanced penalties now requires that the parent or legal guardian is of a minor who actually acquired the product or service, narrowing standing compared to the introduced version which allowed any parent or legal guardian of a minor to bring the action.

TIMELINE

The operative date provision ('This section shall become operative on January 1, 2020') was removed from the amended version.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
11
Key actions
3
Committee
3
Amendments
1
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 1. Page 836.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 5, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 20, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Eloise Reyes
Eloise Reyes
DDemocratic
CA
29