Mental health diversion.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the court to grant pretrial diversion to a defendant diagnosed with a mental disorder if the defendant satisfies certain eligibility requirements and if the court determines that the defendant is suitable for diversion. Existing law defines "pretrial diversion" as the postponement of prosecution to allow the defendant to undergo mental health treatment, subject to certain requirements, such as the court is satisfied that the recommended program will meet the specialized needs of the defendant, among others. Existing law provides that a defendant is suitable for pretrial diversion if certain criteria are met, including that the defendant agrees to comply with the treatment as a condition of diversion and they will not pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety, among others. Existing law defines "unreasonable risk of danger to public safety" as an unreasonable risk that the defendant will commit a new violent felony, as specified. This bill would additionally require that the defendant agree that the recommended treatment plan will meet their specialized needs and would redefine "pretrial diversion" to require that the court is also satisfied that the recommended program is consistent with the underlying purpose of mental health diversion, as described. The bill would state that, notwithstanding the court's determination whether a defendant may pose an unreasonable risk that the defendant will commit a new violent felony, the court retains discretion to deny pretrial diversion if it concludes that the defendant poses an unreasonable risk to the physical safety of another.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Senate Passage
Jun 2025
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2025
Last action Aug 29, 2025
Floor votes · Senate Jun 4, 2025
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Jun 4, 2025
D
Democratic30
93% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
3
Aug 29, 2025
Lower · Passed
August 29 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jul 16, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 16, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1503.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1201.) (May 23).
upper
Mar 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 533.) (March 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 26, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 19, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Henry Stern
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 483
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 483. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline