California Farmland Conservancy Program: conservation easements: funding.
What changed between versions
Removed the five-criteria eligibility system that required recipient entities to meet at least two of: (1) being a city with 250,000+ population or county with 1,500,000+ population (or an entity within/overlapping one), (2) having an agricultural land element in its open-space plan, (3) being in a county with $350 million+ gross agricultural production value, (4) preserving irreplaceable wildlife corridors, or (5) achieving cobenefits like wildlife crossings, carbon sequestration, or water conservation systems.
Added a simpler restriction: funding shall only be awarded for agricultural conservation easements on agricultural land as defined in Section 10213, except for grazing land. This shifts the focus from qualifying entities to qualifying projects and land types.
Removed the bill's own definition of 'agricultural land' as 'land that is flat and produces crops' and the definition of 'tribe' referencing Section 815.3 of the Civil Code.
Added a definition of 'agricultural conservation easement' as any easement as defined in Section 10211.
The bill's summary was revised to reflect the simplified approach: instead of describing allocation to entities meeting specified criteria, it now states the department will expend funds as provided and that funding is limited to agricultural conservation easements on agricultural land.
Senator Laird added as principal coauthor.