California Environmental Quality Act: expired regional habitat conservation plan: exemption.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would exempt from the requirements of CEQA a project developed solely to serve an urgent public health or housing need, as specified, that is within the boundaries of an expired regional habitat conservation plan, and that had an environmental review completed consistent with the requirements of the regional habitat conservation plan as the plan existed before the plan's expiration. Because the bill would require a lead agency to determine the applicability of this exemption, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
03/25/25 - Amended Senate
→
SB424
·
1 edit
MINOR
The bill text of SB 424 remains substantively unchanged between these two versions. The differences are entirely in document formatting and presentation: the old version uses a traditional legislative document layout with page numbers, while the new version is a web-based rendering with navigation elements (skip to content, home, accessibility, etc.). The statutory language, legislative counsel's digest, and all policy provisions are identical.
TECHNICAL
Document formatting changed from a traditional legislative PDF-style layout with page numbers to a web-based HTML rendering with site navigation elements. No substantive policy language was altered.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Amendments
1
Apr 2, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on E.Q. and N.R. & W.
upper
Mar 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 26, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 18, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Shannon Grove
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 424
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 424. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline