Instructional School Gardens Program: reestablishment: Department of Food and Agriculture.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Instructional School Gardens Program for the promotion, creation, and support of instructional school gardens through the allocation of grants, and through technical assistance provided, to school districts, charter schools, or county offices of education. Existing law requires the State Department of Education to administer the program, as provided. This bill would revise and recast the Instructional School Gardens Program by, among other things, reestablishing the program under the administration of the Department of Food and Agriculture for the promotion, creation, and support of instructional school gardens through the allocation of grants and the provision of technical assistance to support instructional school garden programming in school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools. The bill would require the department to convene a working group consisting of the department, the State Department of Education, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, and instructional school garden community-based organizations. The bill would require the working group to advise and assist the Department of Food and Agriculture in carrying out the program, as provided. The bill would establish the Instructional School Gardens and Maintenance Fund in the State Treasury and would require moneys in the fund to be available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to the department for purposes of the program, as specified. This bill, contingent upon an appropriation or receipt of sufficient private funds, as specified, for its purposes, would require the department, on or before July 1, 2026, and in consultation with the working group, to develop a competitive grant process, including selection criteria, goals, prioritizations, and guidelines, for purposes of the program, as provided. The bill would require eligible applicants to be local educational agencies or other entities that have an established track record of operating outdoor, experiential learning programs in schools and that are in partnership, as defined, with at least one local educational agency, and would require applicants to designate one of 2 grant categories for each proposed schoolsite, as provided, and to submit a plan and measurable outcomes for a program of experiential, outdoor instruction that meet specified requirements. Before developing the competitive grant process, the bill would require the department to hold at least 2 public meetings to gather public input on the development of the competitive grant process.
The amended version tightens eligibility requirements for non-school applicants and adds an exemption for expanded learning programs. Community-based organizations and other private entities seeking grants must now demonstrate an established track record of operating outdoor experiential learning programs in schools, and their partnership with a local educational agency must be formally confirmed by a written document. Additionally, the standards-aligned curriculum requirement no longer applies to programming delivered as part of an expanded learning opportunity program under Section 46120.
ELIGIBILITY
Non-LEA applicants (community-based organizations and other private entities) must now have an established track record of operating outdoor, experiential learning programs in schools. This requirement was not explicitly stated in the prior version's main eligibility clause.
The partnership between a community-based organization or private entity and a local educational agency must now be 'confirmed by' a memorandum of understanding, services agreement, or letter of support, rather than simply being defined as one. This strengthens the documentation requirement.
REQUIREMENT
A new exemption was added: the requirement to use standards-aligned curriculum during the instructional day does not extend to programming offered as part of an expanded learning opportunity program under Section 46120 of the Education Code.
The Senate amendment to SB 341 makes several substantive changes to the Instructional School Gardens Program: it adds CAL FIRE and community-based organizations to the interagency working group, removes the California Integrated Waste Management Board, broadens the funding trigger to allow activation through private funds (not just state appropriations), and changes the reporting deadline from six months after final expenditure to the end of the school year. These changes make the program more flexible in how it can be funded and broaden stakeholder involvement.
SCOPE
The working group composition was changed: CAL FIRE (Department of Forestry and Fire Protection) and instructional school garden community-based organizations were added, while the California Integrated Waste Management Board was removed. The working group is now mandatory ('shall convene' and 'shall include') rather than optional ('may convene' and 'may include').
FISCAL
The funding contingency for the competitive grant process was expanded. Previously, operation was contingent solely on a legislative appropriation. Now it can also be triggered by receipt of sufficient private funds (including private grants or donations) as determined by the Department of Food and Agriculture.
ELIGIBILITY
Eligible non-LEA applicants were broadened from 'community-based organizations or other private individuals or entities' to 'community-based organizations or other private individuals or other entities partnering with at least one local educational agency, including, but not limited to, community-based organizations,' making clear that CBOs are just one example of eligible partners.
TIMELINE
The grant reporting deadline was changed from 'within six months of the final expenditure' to 'at the end of the school year in which grants are received,' giving recipients a different (potentially longer) window to submit reports.
DEFINITION
A new definition was added for 'CAL FIRE' meaning the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, reflecting its new role on the working group.
REQUIREMENT
The existing-resources obligation in Section 51796 was narrowed: previously it applied to the Superintendent and multiple agencies including the California Integrated Waste Management Board; now it applies only to the Department of Food and Agriculture, State Department of Education, State Department of Public Health, and CalRecycle.
The April 22 amendment to SB 341 narrows grant eligibility by requiring non-school applicants to have an established track record of operating outdoor experiential learning programs in schools, adds a formal definition of 'partnership,' expands legislative findings to include composting and organic waste reduction goals, and makes minor clarifying edits to curriculum language. The most significant policy change is the new track record requirement, which raises the bar for community organizations seeking grants.
ELIGIBILITY
Non-LEA applicants (community-based organizations, private individuals, other entities) must now have an established track record of operating outdoor, experiential learning programs in schools. Previously they only needed to be partnering with at least one local educational agency.
DEFINITION
A new definition of 'partnership' was added in Section 51797(a)(1)(B), specifying it means a memorandum of understanding, services agreement, or letter of support between the applying entity and a local educational agency.
SCOPE
Legislative findings in Section 51795(b) were expanded to include composting organic waste as part of a statewide effort to reduce organic waste comprising 48 percent of landfill waste, help meet California's 75-percent overall recycling goal, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from landfilling.
REQUIREMENT
Curriculum requirement changed from 'academic standards-aligned curriculum' to 'standards-aligned curricula,' removing the word 'academic' and slightly broadening what qualifies as acceptable curriculum.
TECHNICAL
Minor grammatical and redundancy fixes throughout, including removing duplicate words in Section 51797(c) ('an either of' changed to 'either of') and clarifying integration planning language in Section 51797(a)(2)(D).
Senators Limon and Stern were added as coauthors.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
5
Committee
3
Amendments
3
Feb 2, 2026
Failure
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
upper
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
May 16, 2025
Other
Set for hearing May 23.
upper
May 12, 2025
Other
May 12 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
May 2, 2025
Other
Set for hearing May 12.
upper
Apr 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 932.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 22, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
upper
Mar 28, 2025
Other
Set for hearing April 29.
upper
Mar 20, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
upper
Mar 19, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 420.) (March 19).
upper
Mar 3, 2025
Other
Set for hearing March 19.
upper
Feb 19, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on ED. and AGRI.
upper
Feb 13, 2025
Other
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 15.
upper
Feb 12, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.