Real property tax: welfare exemption: moderate-income housing.
Summary
Existing property tax law, pursuant to constitutional authorization, provides for a "welfare exemption" for property used exclusively for religious, hospital, scientific, or charitable purposes and that is owned or operated by certain types of nonprofit entities, if certain qualifying criteria are met. That law provides a partial welfare exemption in the case of residential rental property used for lower income households, as specified, calculated as that percentage of the value of the property that is equal to the percentage that the number of units serving lower income households represents of the total number of residential units. This bill would provide a partial welfare exemption in the case of certain residential rental property used for low- and moderate-income households. The partial exemption would be equal to that percentage of the value of the property that is equal to the percentage that the number of units serving low- and moderate-income households, as defined, represents of the total number of residential units, as provided. The bill would require an owner to make specified certifications, under penalty of perjury, relating to the use of the property. By expanding the duties of local tax officials, and by expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would declare that its provisions are severable. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 12, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
05/07/25 - Amended Senate
→
SB336
·
1 edit
MINOR
The diff between the Amended Senate version (05/07/25) and the final SB336 version reflects formatting and presentation changes rather than substantive policy changes. The bill text provisions regarding the welfare exemption for moderate-income housing appear identical in both versions. The primary differences are the removal of line numbers and page headers, and the addition of web navigation elements typical of a published legislative website format.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a paginated legislative print format (with line numbers and page headers) to a web-published format with navigation elements. No substantive legal language was changed.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
3
Committee
3
Amendments
1
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
May 14, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 1082.) (May 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
upper
Feb 19, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
upper
Feb 12, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Scott Wiener
DDemocratic
Co
Catherine Stefani
DDemocratic
Co
Matt Haney
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 336
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 336. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline