Urban equestrian inclusion zones.
Summary
Existing law, the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, authorizes, under specified conditions, a city, county, or city and county to establish by ordinance an urban agriculture incentive zone for the purpose of entering into voluntary contracts with landowners to enforceably restrict the use of vacant, unimproved, or otherwise blighted lands for small-scale production of agricultural crops and animal husbandry. Existing law prohibits a city, county, or city and county from entering into a new contract or renewing an existing contract under these provisions after January 1, 2029. This bill would authorize a city, county, or city and county, under specified conditions, to establish by ordinance an urban equestrian inclusion zone within its boundaries for the purpose of entering into enforceable contracts, as described, with landowners, on a voluntary basis, for restricting land use for equestrian activities, as defined. The bill would prohibit a city, county, or city and county from entering into a new contract or renewing an existing contract under these provisions after January 1, 2029. Existing law, the Housing Crisis Act of 2019, prohibits certain counties and cities from enacting a development policy, standard, or condition that would have any of specified effects, including reducing the intensity of land use within an existing general plan land use designation, specific plan land use designation, or zoning district in effect at the time of the proposed change, below what was allowed under the land use designation or zoning ordinances of the county or city, as in effect on January 1, 2018, except as specified. Existing law defines "reducing the intensity of land use" for these purposes. This bill would include entering into enforceable contracts with landowners for restricting land use for equestrian activities within the definition of "reducing the intensity of land use." The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Senate Passage
May 2025
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 11, 2025
Last action Aug 29, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
06/24/25 - Amended Assembly
→
SB322
·
1 edit
MINOR
The changes between these two versions of SB 322 are entirely formatting and presentation changes. The bill text moved from a traditional legislative document format (with line numbers, page headers, and formal layout) to a web page display format with navigation elements. No substantive policy language was added, removed, or modified.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a numbered-line legislative document into a web page layout with navigation menus (skip to content, home, accessibility, FAQ, feedback, sitemap, login), search tools, and version tracking links. All substantive provisions of the bill remain identical between versions.
Floor votes · Senate May 15, 2025
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 40
May 15, 2025
D
Democratic30
86% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Aug 29, 2025
Lower · Passed
August 29 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jul 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
May 29, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
May 15, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 1090.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
May 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
May 5 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 871.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 21, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Mar 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Feb 19, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Feb 11, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Caroline Menjivar
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 322
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 322. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline