SB 27 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court Program.

Summary
Existing law, the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, authorizes specified adult persons to petition a civil court to create a voluntary CARE agreement or a court-ordered CARE plan and implement services, to be provided by county behavioral health agencies, to provide behavioral health care, including stabilization medication, housing, and other enumerated services, to adults who are currently experiencing a severe mental illness and have a diagnosis identified in the disorder class schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and who meet other specified criteria. Existing law authorizes a specified individual to commence the CARE process, known as the original petitioner. Existing law authorizes the court to dismiss a case without prejudice when the court finds that a petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that they qualify for the CARE process. Existing law requires the court to take prescribed actions if it finds that a prima facie showing has been made, including, but not limited to, setting the matter for an initial appearance on the petition. Existing law requires the court, if it determines the parties have entered or are likely to enter into a CARE agreement, to either approve or modify the CARE agreement and continue the matter at a progress hearing in 60 days, or continue the matter for 14 days to allow the parties additional time to enter into an agreement. Existing law prohibits a person from being tried or adjudged to punishment while that person is mentally incompetent. Existing law requires the court to, for a person found mentally incompetent and not charged with certain offenses, among other things, determine whether restoring the person to mental competence is in the interests of justice. Existing law requires the court to, if restoring the person to mental competence is not in the interests of justice, conduct a hearing, as specified, and determine the person's eligibility for diversion. Under existing law, if the court determines, at the first hearing, that the person is ineligible for diversion, the court is required to hold a hearing to determine the person's other options, including the CARE program. Existing law authorizes a court to refer an individual from, among other things, assisted outpatient treatment or conservatorship proceedings, as specified, to CARE Act proceedings. Existing law provides that if the individual is referred from assisted outpatient treatment, the county behavioral health director or their designee shall be the petitioner, whereas if the referral is from conservatorship proceedings, the conservator or proposed conservator is the petitioner. This bill would allow the court to make a prima facie determination without conducting a hearing. The bill, in the first hearing to determine competence to stand trial, would authorize the court to consider the petitioner's eligibility for both diversion and the CARE program. The bill would authorize the court to refer the petitioner to the CARE Act court if the defendant or counsel for the defendant agrees to the referral and the court has reason to believe the petitioner may be eligible for the CARE program. If the petitioner is not accepted into the CARE program or if the CARE Act court refers the petitioner back to criminal court, as specified, the bill would require the criminal court to conduct a hearing to determine whether the petitioner is eligible for a diversion program. The bill would authorize the county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers to share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs. The bill would authorize the court to call additional progress hearings after 60 days. The bill would also include persons suffering from bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except for psychosis related to current intoxication, in the disorder class. The bill would additionally authorize a court to refer an individual from felony proceedings, as specified, to the CARE Act program. The bill would authorize a CARE Act court to consider a referral as a petition for participation in the CARE program if certain requirements are met. The bill would make additional technical and conforming changes. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to develop a mandatory form for use to file a CARE process petition with the court, and requires the petition to be signed under penalty of perjury and include either an affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, as defined, or evidence that the respondent was detained for a minimum of 2 intensive treatments, as specified. The bill would additionally include a nurse practitioner and physician assistant as a licensed behavioral health professional for purposes of individuals authorized to prepare an affidavit supporting a CARE process petition. By increasing various duties on county behavioral health agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2024
Committee Review
Jul 2025
Senate Passage
May 2025
Assembly Passage
Sep 2025
Signed into Law
Oct 2025
Introduced Dec 2, 2024 Signed Oct 10, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons

What changed between versions

09/17/25 - Enrolled 10/10/25 - Chaptered · 3 edits · Oct 10, 2025
MINOR
This diff represents the conversion of SB 27 from its enrolled bill format to its chaptered law format (Chapter 528) after the Governor approved it on October 10, 2025. The statutory text and policy content are unchanged; only the document structure, headers, and administrative markings were modified to reflect its status as enacted law.
TECHNICAL

Document converted from enrolled bill format to chaptered law format: added 'STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL' header, assigned Chapter 528, and recorded the Governor's approval date of October 10, 2025.

Removed Senate and Assembly passage certification lines (Secretary of the Senate, Chief Clerk of the Assembly) and the Governor's receipt line with blank fields for date and time.

Page headers changed from 'SB 27' to 'Ch. 528' throughout the document, and the legislative counsel's digest was reformatted to match the chaptered law layout while retaining identical content.

Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2025 · Assembly Sep 12, 2025

How they voted

390
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
May 27, 2025
D Democratic30
29 Yea 1
96% Yea
R Republican10
10 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
27
Key actions
15
Committee
6
Amendments
8
Oct 10, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 12, 2025
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0-6)
assembly
Sep 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2989.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 12, 2025
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 3339.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 29, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 29).
lower
Jul 17, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 16, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 15).
lower
Jul 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jul 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jun 17, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
June 17 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 5, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 27, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0-1)
senate
May 27, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1237.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 704.) (April 8).
upper
Jan 29, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Dec 2, 2024
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Tom Umberg
Tom Umberg
DDemocratic
CA
34