California Environmental Quality Act: guidelines: study.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA requires the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, formerly named the Office of Planning and Research, to prepare and develop, and the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to certify and adopt, guidelines for the implementation of CEQA. The CEQA guidelines require a lead agency, immediately after deciding that an environmental impact report is required for a project, to send a notice of preparation stating that an environmental impact report will be prepared to the office and each responsible and trustee agency, as specified. This bill would require the office to conduct a study to, among other things, evaluate how locked-in guidelines could impact regulatory certainty for future project proponents, lead agencies, and stakeholders and assess how locked-in guidelines could affect the speed and efficiency of the environmental review process pursuant to CEQA. The bill would define "locked-in guidelines" as CEQA guidelines, that are in effect at the time of the first issuance of the notice of preparation for a project, that apply to the project throughout the course of the environmental review process pursuant to CEQA, regardless of changes in the guidelines that occur after the first issuance of the notice of preparation. The bill would require, on or before January 1, 2027, the office to submit a report to the Governor and the Legislature on the study. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2028.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 28, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
03/20/25 - Amended Senate
→
SB232
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions of SB 232. The differences are entirely formatting and presentation: the bill text was reformatted from a traditional legislative document layout (with line numbers, page breaks, and column headers) to a web-based display format that includes website navigation elements, metadata, and version tracking links.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a printed legislative document style (with line numbers, page numbers, and column layout) to a plain web page format. All substantive provisions - the definition of locked-in guidelines, the four study requirements, the January 1 2027 report deadline, and the January 1 2028 sunset date - remain unchanged.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
4
Committee
3
Amendments
2
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Mar 20, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 19, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 421.) (March 19).
upper
Feb 27, 2025
Upper · Passed
March 5 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 5, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jan 28, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 232
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 232. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline