Crimes: stalking.
What changed between versions
Subdivision (a) no longer lists 'the safety of that person's pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse' as a basis for the stalking crime. The Assembly version allowed a person to be guilty of stalking if they placed another in reasonable fear for the safety of their animal; the enrolled version requires the fear to be for the person's own safety or their immediate family's safety.
The definition of 'credible threat' in subdivision (g) still includes threats to a person's pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse, but this now functions only as a type of threat that can establish the credible threat element rather than as an independent target of fear under the crime itself.
The legislative counsel's digest was corrected. The Assembly version contained a garbled sentence merging two separate descriptions; the enrolled version cleanly states the bill expands the meaning of 'credible threat' to include threats to animals.