Diversion.

Document format changed from official legislative document with line numbers and page headers to a web-based presentation including website navigation elements (skip to content, home, accessibility, FAQ, feedback, sitemap, login, bill search tools, etc.)

The removed version contains a second amendment section that added an explicit statement that 'Diversion pursuant to this section is discretionary in all cases, when exercised consistent with subdivision (b) or (c).' This language is not visible in the added version.

In the removed version's second amendment section, the suitability standard was changed from requiring that the defendant's symptoms 'would respond to mental health treatment' to requiring that 'the proposed mental health diversion plan is clinically appropriate to address the symptoms.' The added version shows the earlier standard.

The removed version's second amendment section reduced the list of offenses excluded from diversion from 13 to 8, removing child abuse (Section 273a), assault of a child under eight resulting in death (Section 273ab), human trafficking (Section 236.1), corporal injury causing great bodily injury (Section 273.5), and cruel or inhuman corporal punishment on a child (Section 273d). The added version shows the longer 13-offense list.

The removed version's second amendment section required that if a court denies diversion, it must orally state the reasons on the record. This requirement is not visible in the added version.

The public safety suitability standard was changed from 'will not pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety, as defined in Section 1170.18' to 'will not pose a substantial and undue risk to the physical safety of another person.' This removes the statutory cross-reference to Section 1170.18 and shifts the focus from general public safety to physical safety of another person.

The prohibition on diversion for child abuse and endangerment (Section 273a) was narrowed to apply only when the offense is charged as a felony, meaning misdemeanor charges under that section would no longer automatically disqualify a defendant.

The prohibition on diversion for inflicting cruel or inhuman corporal punishment on a child (Section 273d) was narrowed to apply only when charged as a felony, similarly allowing misdemeanor defendants to potentially qualify for diversion.

A new prohibited offense was added: corporal injury in violation of Section 273.5 that causes great bodily injury. Defendants charged with this offense are now barred from mental health diversion.

The human trafficking prohibition was clarified to specifically reference Section 236.1, narrowing the scope from all human trafficking offenses to those under that particular statute.

The diagnosis requirement now accepts a diagnosis or rediagnosis within five years (previously only diagnosis), and the finding that the disorder was a significant factor is now explicitly tied to evidence offered in paragraph (1).

Child abuse under Section 273a and cruel or inhuman corporal punishment under Section 273d are now excluded only when charged as a felony, rather than regardless of charging level.

The prior-records bar prohibiting diversion for defendants with two or more prior felonies or a prior strike offense (Section 667 or 1170.12) was entirely removed.

Attempted murder, kidnapping, carjacking, gross vehicular manslaughter (Section 191.5(a)), and the catch-all provision for 'any crime that causes great bodily injury' were all removed from the list of offenses excluded from diversion.

The suitability standard changed from 'will not pose a risk of danger to public safety' to 'will not pose a substantial and undue risk to the physical safety of another person,' narrowing the scope of the safety concern.

The additional hearing when a court intends to summarily grant diversion or other relief is now required only if requested by either party, rather than being mandatory.

Two factors were removed from the list courts may consider in the suitability determination: the defendant's prior response to rehabilitation or counseling programs in the community, and records of conduct while in custody while medication compliant.

The provision allowing a court to deny diversion even when all suitability criteria are met, based on a finding that it is more likely than not the defendant will pose a risk of danger to public safety, was removed.