SB 1342 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Criminal records: relief.

Summary
Existing law, subject to an appropriation, requires the Department of Justice, on a monthly basis, to review the records in the statewide criminal justice databases and identify persons who are eligible for arrest record relief and automatic conviction record relief. Commencing on October 1, 2024, existing law makes arrest record relief available to an eligible person if the arrest occurred on or after January 1, 1973. Under existing law, a person is eligible for arrest record relief under these provisions if, among other things, the arrest was for a misdemeanor offense and the charge was dismissed. This bill, on and after October 1, 2029, additionally makes a person eligible for that relief if the arrest was for a felony offense, all charges arising from the arrest were dismissed, one year has elapsed since the date on which the most recent charge arising from the arrest was dismissed, and no charge arising from the arrest was refiled or is pending during that period. Under existing law, a person is eligible for automatic conviction record relief if the person meets certain requirements, including that it does not appear, based upon information available in the Department of Justice's record, that the person is currently serving a sentence of an offense and there is no indication of pending criminal charges. This bill would, on and after October 1, 2029, require, in determining whether there is a pending criminal charge based on the department's records, the department to conclude that there is no indication of pending criminal charges if at least 3 years have elapsed with no new activity related to that record. The bill would require, in determining whether a person is currently serving a sentence for an offense, the department to conclude that the person is no longer serving a sentence if the department is unable to determine whether a sentence is complete and at least 7 years have passed since the date of conviction. Existing law, subject to an appropriation, on a monthly basis, requires the department to electronically submit a notice to the superior court having jurisdiction over the criminal case and inform the court of all cases for which a complaint was filed and for which relief was granted pursuant to the provisions above. Existing law, for any certain record retained by the court, prohibits the court from disclosing information concerning a conviction granted relief pursuant to specified provisions, including the above provisions, to any person or entity, in any format, except to the person whose conviction was granted relief or a criminal justice agency. This bill would, on and after October 1, 2029, expand the above-described prohibition to include other provisions that authorize relief from a conviction. By placing additional duties on court staff, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. This bill would, on and after October 1, 2029, also require a court, upon the request of the subject of a record granted relief, to furnish a register of action confirming the court's receipt of notification and compliance with a grant of relief for a specified record granted relief under the above provisions. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1203.425 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 1395 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1395 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status passed both 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2026 Last action Aug 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons

What changed between versions

08/13/26 - Amended Assembly 08/21/26 - Amended Assembly · 4 edits · Aug 21, 2026
MODERATE
This amendment to SB 1342 (criminal records relief) makes several targeted changes: it removes the budget-appropriation condition from the operative date of Section 851.92, updates the legislative digest to remove a description of broadening dismissed-charge eligibility and to drop language about requiring notes in local court databases, and adds a new provision incorporating changes from companion bill SB 1395 into Section 1203.425, operative only if both bills pass and this one is enacted last.
TIMELINE

Section 851.92(g) no longer states the section becomes operative on October 1, 2024 subject to an appropriation in the annual Budget Act. It now simply states the section remains in effect only until October 1, 2029 and is repealed as of January 1, 2030, removing the budget condition from the start date.

SCOPE

The digest no longer describes the bill as removing the requirement that a dismissed-charge arrest be for a misdemeanor offense to qualify for relief. The prior version said the bill would make any arrest on or after January 1, 1973 with a dismissed charge eligible; that description has been deleted.

A new digest paragraph states the bill incorporates additional changes to Section 1203.425 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 1395, operative only if both bills are enacted and this bill is enacted last, creating a conditional cross-reference between the two bills.

REQUIREMENT

The digest no longer states that the bill would require local summary criminal history information provided by courts to include notes indicating relief was granted, listing the date the court received notice, and that this note must appear in all local criminal databases maintained by the court.

Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2026 · Assembly Aug 31, 2026

How they voted

279
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
May 27, 2026
D Democratic30
27 Yea 3
90% Yea
R Republican10
9 Nay 1
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
29
Key actions
11
Committee
5
Amendments
6
Aug 31, 2026
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-19-15)
assembly
Aug 30, 2026
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (August 13).
lower
Jun 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 27. Noes 9. Page 4495.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4273.) (May 14).
upper
Apr 7, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 3759.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 20, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors

Sponsors