SB 1303 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Naturopathic Doctors Act.

Summary
Existing law, the Naturopathic Doctors Act, which is repealed on January 1, 2027, establishes the California Board of Naturopathic Medicine within the Department of Consumer Affairs to license and regulate naturopathic doctors. The act requires the board to consist of 9 members, appointed by the Governor, Speaker of the Assembly, or the Senate Committee on Rules, as specified, and requires each member of the board be appointed to a 4-year term. This bill would instead repeal those provisions on January 1, 2031. The bill would specify that the 4-year term expires 4 years after the date of the appointment. To ensure staggered terms, the bill would require that specified members appointed by the Governor after the effective date of this bill be appointed for prescribed term lengths and thereafter would require all appointments be for four-year terms. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to the provisions specifying the appointment authorities for the board members. Existing law sets forth fees associated with the application and renewal of a license, including a renewal fee of $1,000 and authorizing an increase to not more than $1,200. This bill would, instead, specify that this fee range applies to the renewal of an active license and would require the renewal fee for an inactive license to be one-half of the current renewal fee for an active license. The bill would authorize the board to accept the voluntary cancellation of a naturopathic doctor's license, as prescribed, upon the written request of the licensee, provided that the cancellation is not in lieu of an administrative enforcement action. Existing law requires an applicant to have received a degree in naturopathic medicine from an approved naturopathic medical school, as specified. Existing law requires the board to approve a naturopathic medical school program that is accredited by the Council on Naturopathic Medical Education (CNME) or another federally recognized accrediting body if the program meets specified admission and program requirements. This bill would, instead, require the board to approve a program that is accredited by either the CNME or a substantially equivalent accreditor, or that is housed in an accredited institution and meets standards substantially equivalent to those required by CNME, if the program meets the above-described admission and program requirements and other specified requirements. Existing law, the Medical Practice Act, makes it a crime to practice or hold oneself out as practicing medicine, as specified, without having a certificate to do so. Under existing law, providing services other than those specified is not a violation of that crime if the person providing those services discloses that they are not a licensed physician, among other things, and obtains a written acknowledgment from the client before providing those services. The Naturopathic Doctors Act makes it a crime to claim to be a naturopathic doctor without a valid license under the act but does not restrict use of the title "naturopath." The Naturopathic Doctors Act also does not limit activity otherwise allowed by law, including the practice of naturopathy, and authorizes an unlicensed person who engages in specified activities to represent that they "practice naturopathy," if they comply with the above-described provisions of the Medical Practice Act. This bill would revise and recast those provisions. Specifically, the bill would make it a crime to practice or hold oneself out as practicing naturopathic medicine, as specified, without having a license to do so. The bill would specify that engaging in activity that is otherwise allowed by law or using the title "naturopath" is a not a violation of this crime if the person complies with the above-described provisions of the Medical Practice Act and discloses they are not a naturopathic doctor, as provided. By establishing a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law, the Medical Practice Act, prohibits use of any fictitious, false, or assumed name by a physician and surgeon or any doctor of podiatric medicine, as specified, in any public communication, advertisement, sign, or announcement of a practice without a fictitious-name permit. Existing law requires the Medical Board of California or the Division of Licensing to issue a fictitious-name permit if the applicant for the permit satisfies certain conditions, including having a name that includes specified designations. This bill would prohibit the use of any fictitious, false, or assumed name by a naturopathic doctor, as specified, in any public communication, advertisement, sign, or announcement of a practice without a fictitious-name permit. The bill would require the California Board of Naturopathic Medicine to issue a fictitious-name permit if the applicant for the permit satisfies certain conditions. The bill would require the application fee for a fictitious name permit to be $100 and would require the renewal fee for a fictitious-name permit to be $50. The Naturopathic Doctors Act authorizes the board to grant a license to an applicant who meets specified requirements, but who graduated before 1986, and passed a state or Canadian Province naturopathic licensing examination, as specified. The act requires that applications under this provision be received no later than December 31, 2007. This bill would repeal those provisions. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status passed both 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2026 Last action Aug 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons

What changed between versions

08/20/26 - Amended Assembly 08/26/26 - Amended Assembly · 5 edits · Aug 26, 2026
MODERATE
The August 26 amendment to SB 1303 makes several substantive changes to California's naturopathic medicine licensing framework. Most significantly, it removes the requirement that naturopathic medical education programs be accredited by CNME or an equivalent body as a threshold condition for board approval, instead making accreditation just one of several criteria. It also narrows protections for unlicensed persons who practice naturopathy by removing two provisions that previously allowed them to represent they 'practice naturopathy' and protected activities not requiring licensure.
Scope change
The bill's scope narrowed slightly regarding unlicensed naturopathic practice (removing two protections for unlicensed persons) while broadening the board's authority over education program approval by removing CNME accreditation as a threshold requirement.
ELIGIBILITY

Section 3623(a) no longer requires that a naturopathic medical education program be 'accredited by the Council on Naturopathic Medical Education or an equivalent federally recognized accrediting body' as a prerequisite for board approval. Accreditation is now listed as just one of six criteria (criterion 6) rather than a gateway requirement, broadening which programs the board can approve.

SCOPE

Section 3643.5 previously had subdivision (b) stating the chapter may not limit an activity that does not require licensure or is otherwise allowed by law, including the practice of naturopathy when performed consistent with Sections 2053.5 and 2053.6. This subdivision was removed, narrowing the protection for unlicensed naturopathic practice.

Section 3644(d) previously had subdivision (2) allowing an unlicensed person who sells natural products to represent that they 'practice naturopathy' if they comply with specified provisions of the Medical Practice Act. This was removed, eliminating that specific right for unlicensed persons.

TECHNICAL

Section 3640(f) removed the specific cross-reference to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 1200) of the Health and Safety Code when stating that naturopathic doctors must still meet applicable licensure requirements for clinical laboratory tests.

FISCAL

The fiscal note changed 'State-mandated local program' from 'no' to 'yes,' acknowledging that the bill imposes a state-mandated local program with associated costs.

Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2026 · Assembly Aug 30, 2026

How they voted

390
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
May 27, 2026
D Democratic30
30 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican10
9 Yea 1
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
31
Key actions
12
Committee
6
Amendments
8
Aug 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 30, 2026
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 25).
lower
Aug 24, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (August 13).
lower
Jun 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
May 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 4494.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4272.) (May 14).
upper
Apr 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3954.) (April 20).
upper
Apr 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D.
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D.
upper
Feb 20, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Aisha Wahab
Aisha Wahab
DDemocratic
CA
10